Jamotte Aurélien, Chong Chui Fung, Manton Andrew, Macabeo Bérengère, Toumi Mondher
Creativ-Ceutical, 215 rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré, 75008, Paris, France.
Sanofi Pasteur Asia Pacific, 38 Beach Rd, #18-11, South Beach Tower, Singapore, 189767, Singapore.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:630. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3297-1.
Annual trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) containing three influenza strains (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and one B) have been recommended for the prevention of influenza. However, worldwide co-circulation of two distinct B lineages (Victoria and Yamagata) and difficulties in predicting which lineage will predominate each season have led to the development of quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV), which include both B lineages. Our analysis evaluates the public health benefit and associated influenza-related costs avoided which would have been obtained by using QIV rather than TIV in Australia over the period 2002-2012.
A static model stratified by age group was used, focusing on people at increased risk of influenza as defined by the Australian vaccination recommendations. B-lineage cross-protection was accounted for. We calculated the potential impact of QIV compared with TIV over the seasons 2002-2012 (2009 pandemic year excluded) using Australian data on influenza circulation, vaccine coverage, hospitalisation and mortality rates as well as unit costs, and international data on vaccine effectiveness, influenza attack rate, GP consultation rate and working days lost. Third-party payer and societal influenza-related costs were estimated in 2014 Australian dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Using QIV instead of TIV over the period 2002-2012 would have prevented an estimated 68,271 additional influenza cases, 47,537 GP consultations, 3,522 hospitalisations and 683 deaths in the population at risk of influenza. These results translate into influenza-related societal costs avoided of $46.5 million. The estimated impact of QIV was higher for young children and the elderly. The overall impact of QIV depended mainly on vaccine effectiveness and the influenza attack rate attributable to the mismatched B lineage.
The broader protection offered by QIV would have reduced the number of influenza infections and its related complications, leading to substantial influenza-related costs avoided.
含三种流感毒株(甲型H1N1、甲型H3N2和一种乙型)的三价流感疫苗(TIV)已被推荐用于预防流感。然而,两种不同的乙型流感谱系(维多利亚和山形)在全球范围内共同流行,且难以预测每个季节哪种谱系将占主导地位,这促使了四价流感疫苗(QIV)的研发,QIV包含两种乙型谱系。我们的分析评估了在2002年至2012年期间,澳大利亚使用QIV而非TIV所获得的公共卫生效益以及避免的相关流感费用。
使用按年龄组分层的静态模型,重点关注澳大利亚疫苗接种建议所定义的流感高危人群。考虑了乙型谱系交叉保护。我们利用澳大利亚关于流感流行情况、疫苗接种覆盖率、住院率和死亡率以及单位成本的数据,以及关于疫苗效力、流感发病率、全科医生诊疗率和工作日损失的国际数据,计算了2002年至2012年各季节(不包括2009年大流行年份)QIV与TIV相比的潜在影响。以2014年澳元估算第三方支付者和社会的流感相关费用。进行了敏感性分析。
在2002年至2012年期间使用QIV而非TIV,估计可预防流感高危人群中额外的68271例流感病例、47537次全科医生诊疗、3522次住院和683例死亡。这些结果转化为避免了4650万美元的流感相关社会成本。QIV对幼儿和老年人的估计影响更高。QIV的总体影响主要取决于疫苗效力以及由不匹配的乙型谱系引起的流感发病率。
QIV提供的更广泛保护本可减少流感感染及其相关并发症的数量,从而避免大量流感相关费用。