Béranger A, Bellis R, Bracconi M, Mouysset A
EA 4569, Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et de médecine légale, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Descartes, 45, rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
EA 4569, Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et de médecine légale, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Descartes, 45, rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2016 Sep;23(3):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Since the context of the contaminated blood affair in 1983, the homosexual male were excluded from the blood donation in France. This exclusion is often called into question in several countries and is an actual lively debate. In France, reform process is ongoing for a practical change. Three issues make up the discussion: the infectious risk bound to sexual behavior, the feasibility of the powerful biological tests but having a silent window and the protection of the blood recipient. The infectious risk in the homosexual male is higher for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) than in the rest of the population. Even if every person has his/her own individual risk depending on his/her habits, everyone is confronted to the same law. The challenge is to build a consensus, along with the precautionary principle, the non-discrimination policy, and the individual and collective responsibilities.
自1983年受污染血液事件发生以来,法国禁止男同性恋者献血。在多个国家,这一禁令常受到质疑,引发了激烈的讨论。在法国,正在进行改革以实现实际变革。讨论涉及三个问题:性行为带来的感染风险、高效但存在窗口期的生物检测的可行性以及对输血接受者的保护。男同性恋者感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的风险高于其他人群。即便每个人因自身习惯而有不同的个体风险,但所有人都适用同一法律。挑战在于依据预防原则、非歧视政策以及个人和集体责任达成共识。