Ioannou Christos V, Kontopodis Nikolaos, Georgakarakos Efstratios, Kehagias Elias, Metaxa Eleni, Lioudaki Stella, Papaharilaou Yannis, Tsetis Dimitrios
Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, PO Box 1352, 711 10, Heraklion, Greece.
Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Radiol Med. 2016 Nov;121(11):882-889. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0671-0. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
To investigate if the routine use of an aortic balloon within 15-30 min after Ovation stent graft ring inflation would resolve any inflow stenosis, which may reach 60 %, at the level of the sealing rings. Moreover, we estimated the potential hemodynamic compromise in these patients during rest and exercise.
Following 3-dimensional reconstruction of AAA models, cross-sectional area of the infrarenal aorta just proximal the sealing mechanism (A , R , respectively) and internal area at the site of stenosis (A , R , respectively) were measured for 83. Forty-nine patients were managed without and 34 with an aortic balloon use. Pressure drop during rest and exercise was estimated.
Technical success was 98 % and there were no perioperative deaths, one type-I endoleak, and 12 (14.5 %) type-II endoleaks. Median A and R were significantly reduced compared to A [55 % reduction, 143 (range 28-380) mm vs 314 (range 177-531) mm, P value <0.001] and R [42 % reduction, 6.75 (range 3-11) mm vs 10 (range 7.5-13) mm, P value <0.001]. The observed stenosis was significantly less for patients in whom an aortic balloon was used intraoperatively (area reduction 36 vs 59 %, P value = 0.009). This stenosis caused a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant ΔP in both groups during rest (0.13 vs 0.06 mmHg, P value = 0.02) and exercise (1 vs 0.5 mmHg, P value = 0.02).
The advantages of the unique sealing mechanism of the Ovation device seem to be accompanied by an inflow stenosis which is significantly reduced when neck molding with an aortic balloon is used. Overall, the hemodynamic impact of this abnormality seems to be clinically insignificant at 1-month follow-up.
研究在Ovation支架移植物环膨胀后15 - 30分钟内常规使用主动脉球囊是否能解决可能达到60%的密封环水平的流入道狭窄问题。此外,我们评估了这些患者在休息和运动期间潜在的血流动力学损害。
在对腹主动脉瘤模型进行三维重建后,测量了83例患者肾下主动脉刚好在密封机制近端的横截面积(分别为A、R)以及狭窄部位的内部面积(分别为A、R)。49例患者未使用主动脉球囊进行治疗,34例患者使用了主动脉球囊。评估了休息和运动期间的压力降。
技术成功率为98%,围手术期无死亡病例,1例I型内漏,12例(14.5%)II型内漏。与A相比,A和R的中位数显著降低(分别降低55%,143(范围28 - 380)mm对314(范围177 - 531)mm,P值<0.001)以及R(降低42%,6.75(范围3 - 11)mm对10(范围7.5 - 13)mm,P值<0.001)。术中使用主动脉球囊的患者观察到的狭窄明显更小(面积减少36%对59%,P值 = 0.009)。这种狭窄在两组患者休息时(0.13对0.06 mmHg,P值 = 0.02)和运动时(1对0.5 mmHg,P值 = 0.02)均导致了具有统计学意义但临床意义不显著的ΔP。
Ovation装置独特密封机制的优势似乎伴随着流入道狭窄,当使用主动脉球囊进行颈部塑形时,这种狭窄会显著降低。总体而言,在1个月的随访中,这种异常的血流动力学影响在临床上似乎并不显著。