• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)结构的Meta分析及关于新版本的论证

Meta-analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded (BPRS-E) structure and arguments for a new version.

作者信息

Dazzi Federico, Shafer Alan, Lauriola Marco

机构信息

TECOS Department, Guglielmo Marconi University, V. Plinio, 44, 00193, Rome, Italy.

Texas Department of State Health Services, Mental Health and Substance Abuse Division, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.001
PMID:27451107
Abstract

The factor structure of the 24 item BPRS-E was examined to determine the effect of additional items on consensus scales derived primarily from the 18 item BPRS. A meta-analysis (k = 32, n = 10,084) of previous factor analyses of the BPRS-E was conducted using both a co-occurrence similarity matrix and reproduced correlations. Components generally supporting the consensus scales were found suggesting four relatively invariant subscales: Affect (defined by the core items: anxiety, guilt, depression, suicidality), Positive Symptoms (hallucinations, unusual thought content, suspiciousness, grandiosity), Negative Symptoms (blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, motor retardation) and Activation (excitement, motor hyperactivity, elevated mood, distractibility). The additional BPRS-E items primarily contribute directly to a clear Activation dimension which expands and clarifies the traditional 18 item BPRS structure. Though not statistically supported in this meta-analysis, a fifth factor describing disorganization (conceptual disorganization, disorientation, self-neglect, mannerisms-posturing) was present in some analyses and should be considered. The five factor solution including a disorganization factor has theoretical validity based on the pentagonal model of schizophrenia while also containing the same four primary dimensions that were statistically supported in this meta-analysis. A new version of the BPRS (BPRS-26) with modified and additional items is presented. BPRS-26 is supposed to enhance the stability and the comprehensiveness of the scale and to more closely measure this five factor model.

摘要

对24项简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)的因子结构进行了研究,以确定额外项目对主要源自18项简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)的共识量表的影响。使用共现相似性矩阵和重现相关性对先前BPRS-E的因子分析进行了荟萃分析(k = 32,n = 10,084)。发现了总体上支持共识量表的成分,表明存在四个相对不变的子量表:情感(由核心项目定义:焦虑、内疚、抑郁、自杀观念)、阳性症状(幻觉、异常思维内容、猜疑、夸大)、阴性症状(情感迟钝、情感退缩、运动迟缓)和激活(兴奋、运动多动、情绪高涨、注意力分散)。BPRS-E的额外项目主要直接促成了一个清晰的激活维度,该维度扩展并阐明了传统的18项BPRS结构。尽管在该荟萃分析中未得到统计学支持,但在一些分析中存在一个描述紊乱的第五个因子(概念紊乱、定向障碍、自我忽视、行为姿势),应予以考虑。包括紊乱因子的五因子解决方案基于精神分裂症的五边形模型具有理论有效性,同时也包含了在该荟萃分析中得到统计学支持的相同四个主要维度。提出了一个具有修改和额外项目的新版BPRS(BPRS-26)。BPRS-26旨在提高量表的稳定性和全面性,并更紧密地测量这个五因子模型。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded (BPRS-E) structure and arguments for a new version.简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)结构的Meta分析及关于新版本的论证
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
2
Meta-analysis of the brief psychiatric rating scale factor structure.简明精神病评定量表因素结构的荟萃分析。
Psychol Assess. 2005 Sep;17(3):324-35. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.324.
3
Meta-analysis of the positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factor structure.阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)因子结构的元分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Aug;115:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
Meta-analytic exploration of the joint factors of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded (BPRS-E) and the positive and negative symptoms scales (PANSS).简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)和阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)联合因子的荟萃分析探讨。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:519-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Factor structure of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded (BPRS-E) in a large hospitalized sample.大样本住院患者中简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)的因子结构
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Oct;93:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 28.
6
Symptom dimensions in recent-onset schizophrenia and mania: a principal components analysis of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.近期起病的精神分裂症和躁狂症的症状维度:24项简明精神病评定量表的主成分分析
Psychiatry Res. 2000 Dec 27;97(2-3):129-35. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00228-6.
7
The psychopathological factors of refractory schizophrenia.难治性精神分裂症的心理病理因素。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;27(2):108-12. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462005000200007. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
8
Consistency of symptomatic dimensions of schizophrenia over 20 years.精神分裂症症状维度 20 年的一致性。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.030. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
9
Brief psychiatric rating scale expanded version: How do new items affect factor structure?简明精神病评定量表扩展版:新条目如何影响因子结构?
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Jun 30;135(3):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.05.001.
10
Use of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale to facilitate differential diagnosis at acute inpatient admission.使用简明精神病评定量表以促进急性住院入院时的鉴别诊断。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Apr;62(4):304-12; quiz 313-4. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0415.

引用本文的文献

1
Transdiagnostic Symptom Dimensions in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: Towards Dimensional Representations of Pluripotent Risk.超高危精神病个体的跨诊断症状维度:迈向多能风险的维度表征
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;19(8):e70086. doi: 10.1111/eip.70086.
2
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded version: Construct validity using Rasch model analysis.简明精神病评定量表 - 扩展版:使用拉施模型分析的结构效度
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2025 May 15;31:2343. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v31i0.2343. eCollection 2025.
3
Differential gene expression study in whole blood identifies candidate genes for psychosis in African American individuals.
全血中的差异基因表达研究确定了非裔美国人精神病的候选基因。
Schizophr Res. 2025 Jun;280:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2025.04.018. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
4
Differential Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Patients with Schizophrenia Versus Depressive Disorder: Clinical Distinction Between Antipsychotic and Antidepressant Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy.电休克治疗对精神分裂症患者与抑郁症患者的不同影响:电休克治疗抗精神病作用与抗抑郁作用的临床区分
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 27;15(2):126. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020126.
5
Three cases with chronic obsessive compulsive disorder report gains in wellbeing and function following rituximab treatment.三例慢性强迫症患者报告在接受利妥昔单抗治疗后,幸福感和功能得到改善。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1396-1406. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02750-y. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
6
Public mental health services in Southern China and related health outcomes among individuals living with severe mental illness.中国南方的公共精神卫生服务与严重精神障碍患者的相关健康结局。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Aug 29;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00363-0.
7
An exploratory study of the damage markers NfL, GFAP, and t-Tau, in cerebrospinal fluid and other findings from a patient cohort enriched for suspected autoimmune psychiatric disease.一项探索性研究,检测了神经丝轻链(NfL)、胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和总 Tau(t-Tau)这三种脑脊液中的损伤标志物,以及疑似自身免疫性精神病患者队列中的其他发现。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):304. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03021-8.
8
Effects of the mindfulness program for male substance abusers in Thailand on stress, deliberate self-harm, and drug abstinence intention: A repeated-measure design.泰国针对男性药物滥用者的正念训练项目对压力、蓄意自我伤害及戒毒意愿的影响:一项重复测量设计。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Apr 28;10(2):231-239. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3178. eCollection 2024.
9
Efficacy and feasibility of aerobic exercise interventions as an adjunctive treatment for patients with schizophrenia: a meta-Analysis.有氧运动干预作为精神分裂症患者辅助治疗的疗效与可行性:一项荟萃分析
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Jan 2;10(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00426-0.
10
Factor structure of the brief psychiatric rating scale-expanded among outpatients with psychotic disorders in five Southeast European countries: evidence for five factors.简明精神病评定量表扩展版在五个东南欧国家精神病性障碍门诊患者中的因子结构:五因子的证据
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 25;14:1207577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1207577. eCollection 2023.