Dazzi Federico, Shafer Alan, Lauriola Marco
TECOS Department, Guglielmo Marconi University, V. Plinio, 44, 00193, Rome, Italy.
Texas Department of State Health Services, Mental Health and Substance Abuse Division, Austin, TX, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
The factor structure of the 24 item BPRS-E was examined to determine the effect of additional items on consensus scales derived primarily from the 18 item BPRS. A meta-analysis (k = 32, n = 10,084) of previous factor analyses of the BPRS-E was conducted using both a co-occurrence similarity matrix and reproduced correlations. Components generally supporting the consensus scales were found suggesting four relatively invariant subscales: Affect (defined by the core items: anxiety, guilt, depression, suicidality), Positive Symptoms (hallucinations, unusual thought content, suspiciousness, grandiosity), Negative Symptoms (blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, motor retardation) and Activation (excitement, motor hyperactivity, elevated mood, distractibility). The additional BPRS-E items primarily contribute directly to a clear Activation dimension which expands and clarifies the traditional 18 item BPRS structure. Though not statistically supported in this meta-analysis, a fifth factor describing disorganization (conceptual disorganization, disorientation, self-neglect, mannerisms-posturing) was present in some analyses and should be considered. The five factor solution including a disorganization factor has theoretical validity based on the pentagonal model of schizophrenia while also containing the same four primary dimensions that were statistically supported in this meta-analysis. A new version of the BPRS (BPRS-26) with modified and additional items is presented. BPRS-26 is supposed to enhance the stability and the comprehensiveness of the scale and to more closely measure this five factor model.
对24项简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)的因子结构进行了研究,以确定额外项目对主要源自18项简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)的共识量表的影响。使用共现相似性矩阵和重现相关性对先前BPRS-E的因子分析进行了荟萃分析(k = 32,n = 10,084)。发现了总体上支持共识量表的成分,表明存在四个相对不变的子量表:情感(由核心项目定义:焦虑、内疚、抑郁、自杀观念)、阳性症状(幻觉、异常思维内容、猜疑、夸大)、阴性症状(情感迟钝、情感退缩、运动迟缓)和激活(兴奋、运动多动、情绪高涨、注意力分散)。BPRS-E的额外项目主要直接促成了一个清晰的激活维度,该维度扩展并阐明了传统的18项BPRS结构。尽管在该荟萃分析中未得到统计学支持,但在一些分析中存在一个描述紊乱的第五个因子(概念紊乱、定向障碍、自我忽视、行为姿势),应予以考虑。包括紊乱因子的五因子解决方案基于精神分裂症的五边形模型具有理论有效性,同时也包含了在该荟萃分析中得到统计学支持的相同四个主要维度。提出了一个具有修改和额外项目的新版BPRS(BPRS-26)。BPRS-26旨在提高量表的稳定性和全面性,并更紧密地测量这个五因子模型。