• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)因子结构的元分析。

Meta-analysis of the positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factor structure.

机构信息

Austin, TX, USA.

Department of Human Sciences, Lumsa University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Aug;115:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.008
PMID:31128501
Abstract

A meta-analysis of the results of 45 factor analyses (n = 22,812) of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was conducted. Meta-analyses of the PANSS was conducted using both a co-occurrence similarity matrix and reproduced correlations. Both methods produced similar results. Five factors (Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms, Disorganization, Affect and Resistance) emerged clearly across both analyses. The factors and the items defining them were Positive Symptoms (P1 Delusions, G9 Unusual thought content, P3 Hallucinatory behavior, P6 Suspiciousness and persecution, P5 Grandiosity), Negative Symptoms (N2 Emotional withdrawal, N1 Blunted affect, N4 Passive apathetic social withdrawal, N6 Lack of spontaneity, N3 Poor rapport, G7 Motor retardation, G16 Active social avoidance), Disorganization often termed Cognitive (P2 Conceptual disorganization, G11 Poor attention, N5 Difficulty in abstract thinking, G13 Disturbance of volition, N7 Stereotyped thinking, G5 Mannerisms/posturing, G15 Preoccupation, G10 Disorientation), Affect often termed Depression-Anxiety (G2 Anxiety, G6 Depression, G3 Guilt feelings, G4 Tension, G1 Somatic concern) and a small fifth factor that might be characterized as Resistance or Excitement/Activity (P7 Hostility, G14 Poor impulse control, P4 Excitement, G8 Uncooperativeness). Items G1, G4, G10, P5, G5, G15 may not be core items for the PANSS factors and G12 lack of judgment is not a core item. Results of the PANSS meta-analyses were relatively similar to those for meta-analysis of both the BPRS and BPRS-E all of which contain the original 18 BPRS items. The PANSS is distinguished by a much larger number of items to clearly define and measure Negative Symptoms as well as a sufficient number of items to much more clearly identify a Disorganization factor than the BPRS or BPRS-E.

摘要

对 45 项阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)的因素分析结果(n=22812)进行了荟萃分析。使用共现相似矩阵和再现相关系数对 PANSS 进行了荟萃分析。两种方法都得到了相似的结果。两种分析均明确出现了 5 个因子(阳性症状、阴性症状、紊乱、情感和抵抗)。因子及其定义条目为:阳性症状(P1 妄想、G9 奇异思维内容、P3 幻觉行为、P6 多疑和被害妄想、P5 夸大观念);阴性症状(N2 情感迟钝、N1 情感平淡、N4 被动退缩、N6 意志缺乏、N3 情感交流不良、G7 运动迟缓、G16 主动回避社交);紊乱,通常称为认知(P2 概念紊乱、G11 注意困难、N5 抽象思维困难、G13 意志减退、N7 刻板思维、G5 怪异行为/姿势、G15 强迫观念、G10 定向障碍);情感,通常称为抑郁-焦虑(G2 焦虑、G6 抑郁、G3 罪恶感、G4 紧张、G1 躯体关注);以及一个较小的第五因子,可能表现为抵抗或兴奋/活动(P7 敌对、G14 冲动控制差、P4 兴奋、G8 不合作)。条目 G1、G4、G10、P5、G5、G15 可能不是 PANSS 因子的核心条目,G12 缺乏判断力也不是核心条目。PANSS 荟萃分析的结果与 BPRS 和 BPRS-E 的荟萃分析结果相对相似,这两个分析都包含了原始的 18 个 BPRS 条目。与 BPRS 或 BPRS-E 相比,PANSS 的特点是有更多的条目来明确界定和测量阴性症状,以及有足够数量的条目来更清楚地确定紊乱因子。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of the positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factor structure.阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)因子结构的元分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Aug;115:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 10.
2
[A four-dimensional model of chronic schizophrenia based on the factorial structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). A study of a group of 153 chronic schizophrenic patients and comparison with the factorial structure of the BPRS].基于阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)因子结构的慢性精神分裂症四维模型。对153例慢性精神分裂症患者的研究及与简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)因子结构的比较
Encephale. 1997 Jan-Feb;23(1):10-8.
3
Efficacy of iloperidone in schizophrenia: a PANSS five-factor analysis.氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症的疗效:PANSS 五因子分析。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Sep;131(1-3):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Efficacy and safety of yokukansan in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, five-factor analysis).柴胡加龙骨牡蛎汤治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(阳性与阴性症状量表,五因素分析)
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Jan;232(1):155-64. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3645-8. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
5
[Acute schizophrenia concept and definition: investigation of a French psychiatrist population].[急性精神分裂症的概念与定义:对法国精神科医生群体的调查]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82367-x.
6
Meta-analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded (BPRS-E) structure and arguments for a new version.简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)结构的Meta分析及关于新版本的论证
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Meta-analysis of the brief psychiatric rating scale factor structure.简明精神病评定量表因素结构的荟萃分析。
Psychol Assess. 2005 Sep;17(3):324-35. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.324.
8
Meta-analytic exploration of the joint factors of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale - Expanded (BPRS-E) and the positive and negative symptoms scales (PANSS).简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)和阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)联合因子的荟萃分析探讨。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:519-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
Sparse factors for the positive and negative syndrome scale: which symptoms and stage of illness?阳性和阴性症状量表的稀疏因子:哪些症状和疾病阶段?
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Feb 28;225(3):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.025. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
10
An excitement subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.阳性和阴性症状量表的兴奋分量表。
Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):331-7. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00087-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive control in schizophrenia spectrum disorders is associated with long-term movement activity rather than single-bout exercise.精神分裂症谱系障碍中的认知控制与长期运动活动相关,而非单次运动锻炼。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02101-0.
2
Psychiatric Antecedents in Adolescents at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Insights from the "Parma At-Risk Mental States" Follow-up Program.临床高危青少年精神病的精神科前驱因素:来自“帕尔马高危精神状态”随访项目的见解
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01368-0.
3
Subjective language disturbances in young patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR): what relevance for clinical prognosis? A 2-year follow-up study.
超高风险精神病(UHR)年轻患者的主观语言障碍:对临床预后有何关联?一项为期2年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02094-w.
4
Semantic Processing Deficits and Their Use as Early Biomarkers in Schizophrenia.语义加工缺陷及其作为精神分裂症早期生物标志物的应用
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 10;13(16):1958. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161958.
5
Association Between Urban Upbringing and Cortical Gyrification in Persons with Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的城市成长经历与大脑皮质脑回形成之间的关联
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 15:02537176251360933. doi: 10.1177/02537176251360933.
6
[The effectiveness of inpatient treatment of psychoses-Initial results of a naturalistic study].[精神病住院治疗的有效性——一项自然主义研究的初步结果]
Nervenarzt. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s00115-025-01871-1.
7
Targeting Psychotic and Cognitive Dimensions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P): A Narrative Review.针对临床高危精神病性障碍(CHR-P)中的精神病性和认知维度:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5432. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155432.
8
Symptom networks and working memory in schizophrenia: a multi-methodological cross-sectional study from phenotype to endophenotype.精神分裂症中的症状网络与工作记忆:一项从表型到内表型的多方法横断面研究
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Apr-Jun;25(2):100577. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100577. Epub 2025 May 2.
9
The associations of negative and disorganization symptoms with verbal fluency in schizophrenia: the mediation effect of processing speed and cognitive flexibility.精神分裂症中阴性和紊乱症状与言语流畅性的关联:加工速度和认知灵活性的中介作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06597-7.
10
Effects of comorbid alexithymia on cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia: a large-sample study on the Han Chinese population.共病述情障碍对慢性精神分裂症认知功能损害的影响:一项针对汉族人群的大样本研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 6;16:1517540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1517540. eCollection 2025.