Baker Mariwan, Cooper David T, Behrens Claus F
1 Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy Research Unit, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2 Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Oct;89(1066):20160510. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160510. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
In cervical radiotherapy, it is essential that the uterine position is correctly determined prior to treatment delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate an autoscan ultrasound (A-US) probe, a motorized transducer creating three-dimensional (3D) images by sweeping, by comparing it with a conventional ultrasound (C-US) probe, where manual scanning is required to acquire 3D images.
Nine healthy volunteers were scanned by seven operators, using the Clarity(®) system (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). In total, 72 scans, 36 scans from the C-US and 36 scans from the A-US probes, were acquired. Two observers delineated the uterine structure, using the software-assisted segmentation in the Clarity workstation. The data of uterine volume, uterine centre of mass (COM) and maximum uterine lengths, in three orthogonal directions, were analyzed.
In 53% of the C-US scans, the whole uterus was captured, compared with 89% using the A-US. F-test on 36 scans demonstrated statistically significant differences in interobserver COM standard deviation (SD) when comparing the C-US with the A-US probe for the inferior-superior (p < 0.006), left-right (p < 0.012) and anteroposterior directions (p < 0.001). The median of the interobserver COM distance (Euclidean distance for 36 scans) was reduced from 8.5 (C-US) to 6.0 mm (A-US). An F-test on the 36 scans showed strong significant differences (p < 0.001) in the SD of the Euclidean interobserver distance when comparing the C-US with the A-US scans. The average Dice coefficient when comparing the two observers was 0.67 (C-US) and 0.75 (A-US). The predictive interval demonstrated better interobserver delineation concordance using the A-US probe.
The A-US probe imaging might be a better choice of image-guided radiotherapy system for correcting for daily uterine positional changes in cervical radiotherapy.
Using a novel A-US probe might reduce the uncertainty in interoperator variability during ultrasound scanning.
在宫颈癌放疗中,治疗前准确确定子宫位置至关重要。本研究旨在评估一种自动扫描超声(A-US)探头,这是一种通过扫描创建三维(3D)图像的电动换能器,将其与传统超声(C-US)探头进行比较,后者需要手动扫描来获取3D图像。
9名健康志愿者由7名操作人员使用Clarity(®)系统(医科达,瑞典斯德哥尔摩)进行扫描。总共获取了72次扫描,其中C-US探头扫描36次,A-US探头扫描36次。两名观察者在Clarity工作站中使用软件辅助分割来描绘子宫结构。分析了子宫体积、子宫质心(COM)和三个正交方向上的子宫最大长度数据。
在53%的C-US扫描中能够完整捕获整个子宫,而使用A-US时这一比例为89%。对36次扫描进行F检验显示,在比较C-US和A-US探头时,观察者间COM标准差(SD)在上下(p < 0.006)、左右(p < 0.012)和前后方向(p < 0.001)上存在统计学显著差异。观察者间COM距离的中位数(36次扫描的欧几里得距离)从8.5(C-US)降至6.0毫米(A-US)。对36次扫描进行F检验显示,比较C-US和A-US扫描时,观察者间欧几里得距离的SD存在强烈显著差异(p < 0.001)。比较两名观察者时的平均骰子系数,C-US为0.67,A-US为0.75。预测区间表明使用A-US探头时观察者间描绘的一致性更好。
A-US探头成像可能是宫颈癌放疗中校正每日子宫位置变化的图像引导放疗系统的更好选择。
使用新型A-US探头可能会减少超声扫描期间操作者间变异性的不确定性。