Suppr超能文献

用于评估科学课程授课系统的因素的识别与验证。

Identification and validation of factors used to evaluate science course delivery systems.

作者信息

Heath Z

机构信息

Institute of Higher Education, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 1989 Winter;18(2):199-206.

PMID:2745229
Abstract

Deans and faculty from seven academic-health-center-based colleges of allied health participated in a three-round modified Delphi study to identify and validate factors that can be used to evaluate administrative aspects of science course delivery for baccalaureate allied health students in these settings. Factors identified accommodate different organizational structures and apply across programs and science disciplines. Participants identified several science faculty qualifications and roles expected of science faculty, allied health faculty who do not teach sciences, and deans. There was less consensus and fewer expectations on the role of the science faculty when appointment and course sponsorship were external to the college. The findings from this study, which was structured around an interdisciplinary professional education framework, have practical and research relevance for allied health.

摘要

来自七所基于学术健康中心的联合健康学院的院长和教师参与了一项三轮改进的德尔菲研究,以识别和验证可用于评估这些环境中本科联合健康专业学生科学课程教学管理方面的因素。所确定的因素适应不同的组织结构,并适用于各个项目和科学学科。参与者确定了科学教师的几项资格以及对科学教师、不教授科学课程的联合健康教师和院长的期望。当任命和课程赞助来自学院外部时,对于科学教师的角色,共识较少且期望也较少。这项围绕跨学科专业教育框架构建的研究结果,对联合健康具有实践和研究意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验