Jastaniyah Noha, Yoshida Kenji, Tanderup Kari, Lindegaard Jacob Christian, Sturdza Alina, Kirisits Christian, Šegedin Barbara, Mahantshetty Umesh, Rai Bhavana, Jürgenliemk-Schulz Ina-Maria, Haie-Meder Christine, Banerjee Susovan, Pötter Richard
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
To quantify the gross tumor volume at diagnosis (GTV) and high-risk clinical target volume (CTV) at brachytherapy (BT) and describe subgroups of patients with different patterns of response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with FIGO stage IIB and IIIB cervical cancer treated with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). Additionally, to evaluate the feasibility of IGABT achieving adequate target coverage in these groups.
Patients with FIGO stage IIB and IIIB cervical cancer enrolled in the EMBRACE study were analyzed. T2-weighted MRI scans were obtained at diagnosis and at BT. GTV and CTV were defined as per the GEC ESTRO recommendations. Patients were classified taking into account that initial tumor volume and response to CRT represented by the volume of residual disease (CTV) and extent of residual parametrial disease are all major factors determining local dose delivery by BT, local control, and overall disease outcome. These factors were quantified applying the following criteria: (1) volume of the GTV relative to the median volume of the GTV; (2) the ratio (R) of CTV to GTV for each patient; (3) the extent of residual parametrial disease at the time of BT. Accordingly, patients were classified into six groups (G1-G6): stage IB-like tumors (G1), tumors with good response and any size (G2), small tumors with moderate response (G3), large tumors with moderate response (G4), tumors with poor response (G5) and those with progressive disease (G6). Tumor and treatment characteristics were then compared among the first five groups (only 3 patients were allocated to G6).
A total of 481 patients were evaluated. The number of patients in the 6 groups were 55, 78, 123, 147, 75 and 3, respectively. The mean (SD) GTV was 43.6 (32.8)cm and the mean (SD) CTV was 31.6 (16.1)cm. The mean GTV and CTV were 12.6cm and 23.7cm in G1 (R>1.1), 47.5cm and 25.3cm in G2 (R<0.9), 23.9 cm and 29.9cm in G3 (R 0.9-1.1), 73.4cm and 38.5cm in G4 (R 0.9-1.1), 79.4cm and 59.5cm in G5 (R>1.1), respectively. Parametrial disease extent at BT was as follows: no involvement in G1 and G2, proximal at most in G3 and G4, distal or to the pelvic wall in G5, progressive in G6. The use of interstitial needles was progressively higher among the groups (mean 0, 0, 2, 3, 6 in G1-5, P<0.001). The mean GTV D in G1-5 was 103.1Gy, 91.8Gy, 93.5Gy, 88.3Gy and 87.1Gy. The mean CTV D in G1-5 was 95.1Gy, 92.1Gy, 92.6Gy, 87.6Gy and 88.4Gy.
In patients with FIGO stage IIB and IIIB disease, intra-FIGO stage heterogeneity and overlap between the two stages exist with respect to tumor volume, treatment response and extent of parametrial disease at BT. Taking into account GTV, parametrial disease at BT and the ratio of CTV/GTV, five major groups exist. These enable prediction of GTV and CTV dose coverage through BT. IGABT, as performed in EMBRACE, accommodates to a considerable degree for the different variants of tumor regression in these groups through adaptation of the treatment technique including the use of needles. However, major variations remain at present with regard to dose to GTV and to CTV, which are most pronounced in G4 and G5. This new classification will be validated in future in regard to clinical outcome in EMBRACE.
对诊断时的大体肿瘤体积(GTV)和近距离放疗(BT)时的高危临床靶区体积(CTV)进行量化,并描述国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IIB期和IIIB期宫颈癌患者在接受图像引导自适应近距离放疗(IGABT)时对放化疗(CRT)有不同反应模式的患者亚组。此外,评估IGABT在这些组中实现足够靶区覆盖的可行性。
分析了纳入EMBRACE研究的FIGO IIB期和IIIB期宫颈癌患者。在诊断时和BT时获取T2加权MRI扫描图像。GTV和CTV根据GEC ESTRO建议进行定义。考虑到初始肿瘤体积以及以残余疾病体积(CTV)和残余宫旁疾病范围表示的对CRT的反应都是决定BT局部剂量递送、局部控制和总体疾病结局的主要因素,对患者进行分类。应用以下标准对这些因素进行量化:(1)GTV体积相对于GTV中位体积;(2)每位患者的CTV与GTV之比(R);(3)BT时残余宫旁疾病的范围。据此,将患者分为六组(G1 - G6):IB期样肿瘤(G1)、反应良好的任何大小肿瘤(G2)、反应中等的小肿瘤(G3)、反应中等的大肿瘤(G4)、反应差的肿瘤(G5)和疾病进展的肿瘤(G6)。然后在前五组中比较肿瘤和治疗特征(仅3例患者被分配到G6组)。
共评估了481例患者。6组患者数量分别为55、78、123、147、75和3例。平均(标准差)GTV为43.6(32.8)cm,平均(标准差)CTV为31.6(16.1)cm。G1组(R>1.1)的平均GTV和CTV分别为12.6cm和23.7cm,G2组(R<0.9)为47.5cm和25.3cm,G3组(R 0.9 - 1.1)为23.9 cm和29.9cm,G4组(R 0.9 - 1.1)为73.4cm和38.5cm,G5组(R>1.1)为79.4cm和59.5cm。BT时宫旁疾病范围如下:G1组和G2组无累及,G3组和G4组最多累及近端,G5组累及远端或至盆腔壁,G6组为进展期。各组间间质针的使用逐渐增多(G1 - 5组平均分别为0、0、2支、3支、6支,P<0.001)。G1 - 5组的平均GTV D分别为103.1Gy、91.8Gy、93.5Gy、88.3Gy和87.1Gy。G1 - 5组的平均CTV D分别为95.1Gy、92.1Gy、92.6Gy、87.6Gy和88.4Gy。
在FIGO IIB期和IIIB期疾病患者中,在肿瘤体积、治疗反应和BT时宫旁疾病范围方面,FIGO期内存在异质性且两期之间存在重叠。考虑到GTV、BT时的宫旁疾病以及CTV/GTV之比,存在五个主要组。这有助于预测通过BT对GTV和CTV的剂量覆盖。如在EMBRACE中所实施的IGABT,通过调整包括使用针在内的治疗技术,在很大程度上适应了这些组中肿瘤退缩的不同变体。然而,目前GTV和CTV的剂量仍存在较大差异,在G4组和G5组中最为明显。这种新分类将在未来关于EMBRACE临床结局方面得到验证。