Lai Calvin K, Skinner Allison L, Cooley Erin, Murrar Sohad, Brauer Markus, Devos Thierry, Calanchini Jimmy, Xiao Y Jenny, Pedram Christina, Marshburn Christopher K, Simon Stefanie, Blanchar John C, Joy-Gaba Jennifer A, Conway John, Redford Liz, Klein Rick A, Roussos Gina, Schellhaas Fabian M H, Burns Mason, Hu Xiaoqing, McLean Meghan C, Axt Jordan R, Asgari Shaki, Schmidt Kathleen, Rubinstein Rachel, Marini Maddalena, Rubichi Sandro, Shin Jiyun-Elizabeth L, Nosek Brian A
Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University.
Department of Psychology, University of Washington.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):1001-16. doi: 10.1037/xge0000179. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
Implicit preferences are malleable, but does that change last? We tested 9 interventions (8 real and 1 sham) to reduce implicit racial preferences over time. In 2 studies with a total of 6,321 participants, all 9 interventions immediately reduced implicit preferences. However, none were effective after a delay of several hours to several days. We also found that these interventions did not change explicit racial preferences and were not reliably moderated by motivations to respond without prejudice. Short-term malleability in implicit preferences does not necessarily lead to long-term change, raising new questions about the flexibility and stability of implicit preferences. (PsycINFO Database Record
内隐偏好是可塑的,但这种变化会持久吗?我们测试了9种干预措施(8种真实的和1种虚假的),以随着时间的推移减少内隐的种族偏好。在两项共有6321名参与者的研究中,所有9种干预措施都立即降低了内隐偏好。然而,在延迟数小时至数天后,没有一种干预措施是有效的。我们还发现,这些干预措施并没有改变明确的种族偏好,也没有因无偏见回应的动机而得到可靠的调节。内隐偏好的短期可塑性不一定会导致长期变化,这引发了关于内隐偏好的灵活性和稳定性的新问题。(PsycINFO数据库记录)