• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内隐偏见与刻板印象:它们的自动化程度如何?特刊引言

Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: how automatic are they? Introduction to the special section.

作者信息

Devine P G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin--Madison, 53706, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):757-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.757.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.757
PMID:11708554
Abstract

This special issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cogniition addresses issues of the measurement and the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. The findings raise fundamental questions about the assumptions underlying the assessment of implicit prejudice, particularly with regard to the widely used Implicit Association Test and the assumption of extant models of prejudice and stereotyping that implicit biases are automatically and invariantly activated when perceivers come in contact with members of stigmatized groups. Several of the articles show that contextual manipulations produce reductions in implicit manifestations of prejudice and stereotyping. The articles in this issue, in challenging conventional wisdom, are thought provoking and should be generative in the field's ongoing efforts to understand the role of implicit (and explicit) processes involved in prejudice and stereotyping.

摘要

《人格与社会心理学杂志:态度与社会认知》的这一特刊探讨了内隐偏见和刻板印象的测量及可塑性问题。这些研究结果对评估内隐偏见背后的假设提出了根本性问题,尤其是对于广泛使用的内隐联想测验以及现有偏见和刻板印象模型所基于的假设,即当感知者接触到被污名化群体的成员时,内隐偏见会自动且不变地被激活。几篇文章表明,情境操纵会减少偏见和刻板印象的内隐表现。本期的这些文章挑战了传统观念,发人深省,在该领域持续努力理解偏见和刻板印象中所涉及的内隐(和外显)过程的作用方面应能产生推动作用。

相似文献

1
Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: how automatic are they? Introduction to the special section.内隐偏见与刻板印象:它们的自动化程度如何?特刊引言
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):757-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.757.
2
"Unlearning" automatic biases: the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.“摒弃”自动偏见:内隐偏见与刻板印象的可塑性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):856-68. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.856.
3
Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.内隐社会认知:态度、自尊与刻板印象。
Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):4-27. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4.
4
Implicit and explicit racial prejudice and stereotyping toward Black (vs. White) Americans: The prevalence and variation among genetic counselors in North America.对美国黑人(与白人相比)的内隐和外显种族偏见和刻板印象:北美的遗传咨询师中的流行程度和变化。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):397-410. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1648. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Contextual variations in implicit evaluation.内隐评价中的情境变化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Sep;132(3):455-69. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.455.
6
Implicit bias toward cervical cancer: Provider and training differences.对宫颈癌的隐性偏见:提供者和培训的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
7
Power effects on implicit prejudice and stereotyping: The role of intergroup face processing.权力对内隐偏见和刻板印象的影响:群体间面孔加工的作用。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Apr;12(2):218-231. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1144647. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Category and stereotype activation revisited.再谈类别与刻板印象激活
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Dec;47(6):513-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00523.x.
9
Imagine All The Synchrony: The effects of actual and imagined synchronous walking on attitudes towards marginalised groups.想象一下所有的同步:实际和想象中的同步行走对边缘化群体态度的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0216585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216585. eCollection 2019.
10
On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.论自动态度的可塑性:用受喜爱和厌恶个体的形象对抗自动偏见。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):800-14. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.800.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender categorization and memory in transgender and cisgender people.跨性别者和顺性别者的性别分类与记忆
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;116. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104691. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Overcoming the threat of anti-bias interventions: Combining self-report and psychophysiological measures to capture the process of change.克服反偏见干预措施的威胁:结合自我报告和心理生理测量方法来捕捉变化过程。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0314813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314813. eCollection 2025.
3
Explicit and implicit attitudes toward smoking: Dissociation of attitudes and different characteristics for an implicit attitude in smokers and nonsmokers.
对吸烟的显性和隐性态度:吸烟者和不吸烟者的态度分离和隐性态度的不同特征。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275914. eCollection 2022.
4
The values you endorse set the body you see: The protective effect of intrinsic life goals on men's body dissatisfaction.你所信奉的价值观决定了你所看到的身体:内在生活目标对男性身体不满的保护作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Aug;63(4):393-404. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12818. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Stronger Prejudices Are Associated With Decreased Model-Based Control.更强的偏见与基于模型的控制能力下降有关。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:767022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767022. eCollection 2021.
6
The implicit beliefs and implicit behavioral tendencies towards smoking-related cues among Chinese male smokers and non-smokers.中国男性烟民和非烟民对与吸烟相关线索的内隐信念和内隐行为倾向。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 25;19(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7319-7.
7
Methodological Bias That Can Reduce (or Affect) the Process of Diagnostic Construction in Clinical Settings.可能会减少(或影响)临床环境中诊断构建过程的方法学偏倚。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 5;10:157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00157. eCollection 2019.
8
Relationships Between Individual Endorsement of Aggressive Behaviors and Thoughts With Prejudice Relevant Correlates Among Adolescents.青少年中攻击性行为和思想的个体认同与偏见相关因素之间的关系。
Eur J Psychol. 2017 Mar 3;13(1):47-59. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v13i1.1223. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Taking a Stand: The Genetics Community's Responsibility for Intelligence Research.表明立场:遗传学领域对智力研究的责任。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 Sep-Oct;45(5 Suppl):S54-8. doi: 10.1002/hast.500.
10
Legitimating Racial Discrimination: Emotions, Not Beliefs, Best Predict Discrimination in a Meta-Analysis.使种族歧视合法化:在一项元分析中,情绪而非信念最能预测歧视行为。
Soc Justice Res. 2008 Sep;21(3):263-396. doi: 10.1007/s11211-008-0071-2.