Stuedemann Fedko Andrea, Thomas Dreifuerst Kristina
Author Affiliations: Doctoral Candidate (Mrs Stuedemann Fedko) and Assistant Professor (Dr Thomas Dreifuerst), School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Nurse Educ. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):47-50. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000290.
Faculty frequently use the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) to identify students' clinical judgment; however, it is unclear whether LCJR scores relate to appropriate nursing action. In a pilot study consisting of senior-level nursing students (N = 22), participants were scored on the LCJR and anticipated nursing actions, and results were analyzed using simple linear regression. There was a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.364) between clinical judgment and nursing action. Results suggest that total LCJR scores may be an indicator of the completion of indicated nursing action.
教师经常使用拉斯特临床判断量表（LCJR）来评估学生的临床判断能力；然而，尚不清楚LCJR得分是否与适当的护理行为相关。在一项由高年级护理专业学生（N = 22）参与的试点研究中，参与者在LCJR和预期护理行为方面接受评分，并使用简单线性回归分析结果。临床判断与护理行为之间存在统计学上的显著相关性（r = 0.364）。结果表明，LCJR总分可能是完成指定护理行为的一个指标。
