Flood Andrew, Waddington Gordon, Thompson Kevin, Cathcart Stuart
a Centre for Applied Psychology, Faculty of Health , University of Canberra , Canberra , Australia.
b University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise , University of Canberra , Canberra , Australia.
J Sports Sci. 2017 Jun;35(11):1066-1072. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210196. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
The potential relationship between physical activity and endogenous pain modulatory capacity remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the pain modulatory responses of athletes and non-athletes. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was assessed in 15 athletes and 15 non-athletes at rest. Participation was restricted to pain-free males between 18 and 40 years of age. To measure CPM capacity, a sequential CPM testing protocol was implemented, whereby a test stimulus (pressure pain threshold [PPT]) was presented before and immediately after a conditioning stimulus (4-min cold-pressor test). Pain intensity ratings were obtained at 15-s intervals throughout the cold-pressor task using a numerical rating scale. Athletes demonstrated higher baseline PPTs compared to non-athletes (P = .03). Athletes also gave lower mean (P < .001) and maximum (P < .001) pain intensity ratings in response to the conditioning stimulus. The conditioning stimulus had a stronger inhibitory effect on the test stimulus in athletes, showing enhanced CPM in athletes compared to non-athletes (P < .05). This finding of enhanced CPM in athletes helps clarify previous mixed findings. Potential implications for exercise performance and injury are discussed.
体育活动与内源性疼痛调节能力之间的潜在关系仍不明确。因此,本研究的目的是比较运动员和非运动员的疼痛调节反应。对15名运动员和15名非运动员在静息状态下进行条件性疼痛调制(CPM)评估。参与者仅限18至40岁无疼痛的男性。为测量CPM能力,实施了一项序贯CPM测试方案,即在条件刺激(4分钟冷加压试验)之前和之后立即施加测试刺激(压力疼痛阈值[PPT])。在整个冷加压任务期间,每隔15秒使用数字评分量表获取疼痛强度评分。与非运动员相比,运动员表现出更高的基线PPT(P = 0.03)。运动员对条件刺激的平均疼痛强度评分(P < 0.001)和最大疼痛强度评分(P < 0.001)也更低。条件刺激对运动员的测试刺激具有更强的抑制作用,表明与非运动员相比,运动员的CPM增强(P < 0.05)。运动员CPM增强这一发现有助于阐明先前的混合研究结果。文中还讨论了对运动表现和损伤的潜在影响。