Griffin Kristen H, Nate Kent C, Rivard Rachael L, Christianson Jon B, Dusek Jeffery A
Integrative Health Research Center, Penny George Institute for Health and Healing, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 25;6(7):e012006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012006.
To examine patterns of, and decision-making processes, informing referrals for inpatient access to integrative medicine (IM) services at a large, acute care hospital.
Retrospective electronic health record review and structured qualitative interviews.
A 630-bed tertiary care hospital with an IM service available to inpatients.
IM referrals of all inpatients aged ≥18 years between July 2012 and December 2014 were identified using the hospital's electronic health record. Fifteen physicians, 15 nurses and 7 administrators were interviewed to better understand roles and perspectives in referring patients for IM services.
In the study hospital, primary sources of referrals for IM services were the orthopaedic and neuroscience/spine service lines. While the largest absolute number of IM referrals was made for patients with lengths of stay of 3 days or fewer, a disproportionate number of total IM referrals was made for patients with long lengths of stay (≥10 days), compared with a smaller percentage of patients in the hospital with lengths of stay ≥10 days. Physicians and nurses were more likely to refer patients who displayed strong symptoms (eg, pain and anxiety) and/or did not respond to conventional therapies. IM referrals were predominantly nurse-initiated. A built-in delay in the time from referral initiation to service delivery discouraged referrals of some patients.
Conventional providers refer patients for IM services when these services are available in a tertiary hospital. Referral patterns are influenced by patient characteristics, operational features and provider perspectives. Nurses play a key role in the referral process. Overcoming cultural and knowledge differences between conventional and IM providers is likely to be a continuing challenge to providing IM in inpatient settings.
研究一家大型急症医院中,住院患者转介接受整合医学(IM)服务的模式及决策过程。
回顾性电子健康记录审查及结构化定性访谈。
一家拥有630张床位的三级护理医院,为住院患者提供IM服务。
通过医院电子健康记录识别出2012年7月至2014年12月期间所有年龄≥18岁住院患者的IM转介情况。对15名医生、15名护士和7名管理人员进行访谈,以更好地了解在为患者转介IM服务中的角色和观点。
在该研究医院中,IM服务转介的主要来源是骨科和神经科学/脊柱服务线。虽然IM转介的绝对数量最多的是住院时间为3天或更短的患者,但与住院时间≥10天的患者在医院中所占较小比例相比,住院时间长(≥10天)的患者在IM转介总数中所占比例过高。医生和护士更有可能转介表现出强烈症状(如疼痛和焦虑)和/或对传统疗法无反应的患者。IM转介主要由护士发起。从转介开始到服务提供之间存在固有的延迟,这阻碍了一些患者的转介。
当三级医院提供IM服务时,传统医疗服务提供者会将患者转介过来。转介模式受患者特征、运营特点和医疗服务提供者观点的影响。护士在转介过程中起关键作用。克服传统医疗服务提供者与IM医疗服务提供者之间的文化和知识差异,可能仍然是在住院环境中提供IM服务面临的挑战。