Suppr超能文献

将个体化和通用补充医学治疗与标准护理相结合相较于单纯标准护理在减轻术前焦虑方面的有效性。

Effectiveness of integrating individualized and generic complementary medicine treatments with standard care versus standard care alone for reducing preoperative anxiety.

作者信息

Attias Samuel, Keinan Boker Lital, Arnon Zahi, Ben-Arye Eran, Bar'am Ayala, Sroka Gideon, Matter Ibrahim, Somri Mostafa, Schiff Elad

机构信息

Complementary & Integrative Surgery Service, and the Surgery Department, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Israel; School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Israel.

School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Israel; Israel Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2016 Mar;29:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.10.017. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Preoperative anxiety is commonly reported by people undergoing surgery. A significant number of studies have found a correlation between preoperative anxiety and post-operative morbidity. Various methods of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) were found to be effective in alleviating preoperative anxiety. This study examined the relative effectiveness of various individual and generic CAM methods combined with standard treatment (ST) in relieving preoperative anxiety, in comparison with ST alone.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Holding room area

PATIENTS

Three hundred sixty patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly divided into 6 equal-sized groups. Group 1 received the standard treatment (ST) for anxiety alleviation with anxiolytics. The five other groups received the following, together with ST (anxiolytics): Compact Disk Recording of Guided Imagery (CDRGI); acupuncture; individual guided imagery; reflexology; and individual guided imagery combined with reflexology, based on medical staff availability.

MEASUREMENTS

Assessment of anxiety was taken upon entering the holding room area (surgery preparation room) ('pre-treatment assessment'), and following the treatment, shortly before transfer to the operating room ('post-treatment assessment'), based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire. Data processing included comparison of VAS averages in the 'pre' and 'post' stages among the various groups.

MAIN RESULTS

Preoperatively, CAM treatments were associated with significant reduction of anxiety level (5.54-2.32, p<0.0001). In contrast, no significant change was noted in the standard treatment group (4.92-5.44, p=0.15). Individualized CAM treatments did not differ significantly in outcomes. However, CDRGI was less effective than individualized CAM (P<0.001), but better than ST (p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Individual CAM treatments integrated within ST reduce preoperative anxiety significantly, compared to standard treatment alone, and are more effective than generic CDRGI. In light of the scope of preoperative anxiety and its implications for public health, integration of CAM therapies with ST should be considered for reducing preoperative anxiety.

摘要

研究目的

接受手术的患者术前焦虑情况较为常见。大量研究发现术前焦虑与术后发病率之间存在关联。人们发现多种补充替代医学(CAM)方法在缓解术前焦虑方面有效。本研究比较了各种单独及通用的CAM方法与标准治疗(ST)联合使用时,相对于单独使用ST在缓解术前焦虑方面的相对有效性。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

等候区

患者

360名患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分为6个等规模组。第1组接受使用抗焦虑药缓解焦虑的标准治疗(ST)。其他五组根据医护人员的可用性,在接受ST(抗焦虑药)的基础上,分别接受以下治疗:引导式意象的光盘录音(CDRGI);针灸;个体引导式意象;反射疗法;以及个体引导式意象与反射疗法相结合。

测量方法

基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)问卷,在进入等候区(手术准备室)时(“治疗前评估”)以及治疗后、即将转入手术室之前(“治疗后评估”)对焦虑进行评估。数据处理包括比较各组“治疗前”和“治疗后”阶段的VAS平均值。

主要结果

术前,CAM治疗与焦虑水平显著降低相关(5.54 - 2.32,p < 0.0001)。相比之下,标准治疗组未观察到显著变化(4.92 - 5.44,p = 0.15)。个体化的CAM治疗在结果上没有显著差异。然而,CDRGI的效果不如个体化的CAM(P < 0.001),但优于ST(p = 0.005)。

结论

与单独的标准治疗相比,在ST中整合个体CAM治疗可显著降低术前焦虑,且比通用的CDRGI更有效。鉴于术前焦虑的范围及其对公众健康的影响,应考虑将CAM疗法与ST相结合以降低术前焦虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验