1 University of Denver, CO, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jun;34(12):2419-2437. doi: 10.1177/0886260516660971. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
We explored the relation between empathy, callous-unemotional (CU) traits, and animal abuse in a sample of 290 seven- to twelve-year-old children whose mothers were exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). The sample comprises mostly Latino and White participants, and 55% of the children's mothers were born outside the United States (primarily Mexico). To our knowledge, among studies examining child-perpetrated animal abuse, this study is the first to examine empathy levels and one of only a few to examine CU traits. When comparing Griffith Empathy Measure (empathy) and Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (callous-unemotional [CU] traits) scores with those from studies of White schoolchildren, our sample scored lower on affective empathy, higher on cognitive empathy, and lower for overall CU scores as well as Callous and Unemotional subscales. Of 290 children, 47 (16.2%) harmed an animal at least once according to either mother or child report. There were no significant sex or age differences between Abuse and No Abuse groups. The Abuse group scored significantly higher on affective empathy, CU, and Callousness/Unemotional subscales, and significantly lower on cognitive empathy. However, in regression analyses that controlled for income, only lower cognitive empathy and higher CU significantly predicted having abused an animal. In summary, low cognitive empathy (but not affective empathy) and CU traits may serve as reliable predictors of child animal abuse. However, replication of these results is necessary. A larger sample with a high percentage of Latino children whose mothers were exposed to IPV, along with a non-exposed comparison group, would be ideal.
我们在一个 290 名 7 至 12 岁儿童的样本中探索了同理心、无情特质(CU)与母亲遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的儿童虐待动物之间的关系。该样本主要由拉丁裔和白人参与者组成,55%的儿童母亲出生在美国境外(主要是墨西哥)。据我们所知,在研究儿童实施的动物虐待的研究中,这项研究首次检查了同理心水平,也是少数检查 CU 特征的研究之一。当将格里菲斯同理心量表(同理心)和无情特质量表(CU 特质)的分数与白人学童的研究结果进行比较时,我们的样本在情感同理心方面的得分较低,在认知同理心方面的得分较高,在总体 CU 得分以及冷酷和冷漠子量表方面的得分较低。在 290 名儿童中,根据母亲或儿童报告,有 47 名(16.2%)至少有一次伤害过动物。在虐待和非虐待组之间,性别和年龄没有显著差异。虐待组在情感同理心、CU 和冷酷/冷漠子量表上的得分显著较高,而在认知同理心上的得分显著较低。然而,在控制收入的回归分析中,只有较低的认知同理心和较高的 CU 显著预测了虐待动物。总之,低认知同理心(而不是情感同理心)和 CU 特征可能是儿童虐待动物的可靠预测因素。然而,有必要复制这些结果。一个具有较高比例的拉丁裔儿童且其母亲遭受 IPV 的更大样本,以及一个未暴露的对照组,将是理想的。