Mota-Rojas Daniel, Mariti Chiara, Marcet-Rius Míriam, Lezama-García Karina, Gazzano Angelo, Hernández-Ávalos Ismael, Mora-Medina Patricia, Domínguez-Oliva Adriana, Whittaker Alexandra L
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City 04960, Mexico.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;12(17):2257. doi: 10.3390/ani12172257.
Throughout history it has been common to practice activities which significantly impact on animal welfare. Animal fighting, including dogfighting, is a prime example where animals often require veterinary care, either to treat wounds and fractures or to manage pain associated with tissue and where death may even result. Amongst the detrimental health effects arising are the sensory alterations that these injuries cause, which not only include acute or chronic pain but can also trigger a greater sensitivity to other harmful (hyperalgesia) or even innocuous stimuli (allodynia). These neurobiological aspects are often ignored and the erroneous assumption made that the breeds engaged in organized fighting have a high pain threshold or, at least, they present reduced or delayed responses to painful stimuli. However, it is now widely recognized that the damage these dogs suffer is not only physical but psychological, emotional, and sensory. Due to the impact fighting has on canine welfare, it is necessary to propose solution strategies, especially educational ones, i.e., educating people and training veterinarians, the latter potentially playing a key role in alerting people to all dog welfare issues. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the risk factors associated with dogfighting generally (dog temperament, age, sex, nutrition, testosterone levels, environment, isolation conditions, socialization, education, or training). A neurobiological approach to this topic is taken to discuss the impact on dog pain and emotion. Finally, a general discussion of the format of guidelines and laws that seek to sanction them is presented. The role that veterinarians can play in advancing dog welfare, rehabilitating dogs, and educating the public is also considered.
纵观历史,从事对动物福利有重大影响的活动屡见不鲜。动物搏斗,包括斗狗,就是一个典型例子,在这种情况下动物常常需要兽医护理,要么治疗伤口和骨折,要么处理与组织相关的疼痛,甚至可能导致死亡。这些伤害所带来的有害健康影响包括感官改变,这不仅包括急性或慢性疼痛,还可能引发对其他有害刺激(痛觉过敏)甚至无害刺激(感觉异常)的更高敏感性。这些神经生物学方面的问题常常被忽视,人们错误地认为参与有组织搏斗的犬种具有很高的疼痛阈值,或者至少它们对疼痛刺激的反应减弱或延迟。然而,现在人们普遍认识到,这些狗所遭受的伤害不仅是身体上的,还有心理、情感和感官上的。由于搏斗对犬类福利的影响,有必要提出解决策略,特别是教育方面的策略,即教育人们并培训兽医,兽医在提醒人们关注所有犬类福利问题方面可能发挥关键作用。因此,本综述的目的是描述与斗狗普遍相关的风险因素(犬的性情、年龄、性别、营养、睾酮水平、环境、隔离条件、社交、教育或训练)。本文采用神经生物学方法来讨论对犬类疼痛和情感的影响。最后,对旨在制裁斗狗行为的指导方针和法律形式进行了一般性讨论。还考虑了兽医在促进犬类福利、使犬类康复以及教育公众方面可以发挥的作用。