Bleijenberg Nienke, Drubbel Irene, Schuurmans Marieke J, Dam Hester Ten, Zuithoff Nicolaas P A, Numans Mattijs E, de Wit Niek J
Department of General Practice, Nursing Science and Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Rehabilitation, Nursing Science and Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1779-88. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14325. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
To determine the effectiveness of a proactive primary care program on the daily functioning of older people in primary care.
Single-blind, three-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.
Primary care setting, 39 general practices in the Netherlands.
Community-dwelling people aged 60 and older (N = 3,092).
A frailty screening intervention using routine electronic medical record data to identify older people at risk of adverse events followed by usual care from a general practitioner; after the screening intervention, a nurse-led care program consisting of a comprehensive geriatric assessment, evidence-based care planning, care coordination, and follow-up; usual care.
Primary outcome was daily functioning measured using the Katz-15 (6 activities of daily living (ADLs), 8 instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), one mobility item (range 0-15)); higher scores indicate greater dependence. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, primary care consultations, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, nursing home admissions, and mortality.
The participants in both intervention arms had less decline in daily functioning than those in the usual care arm at 12 months (mean Katz-15 score: screening arm, 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.77-1.97; screening and nurse-led care arm, 1.88, 95% CI = 1.80-1.96; control group, 2.03, 95% CI = 1.92-2.13; P = .03). No differences in quality of life were observed.
Participants in both intervention groups had less decline than those in the control group at 1-year follow-up. Despite the statistically significant effect, the clinical relevance is uncertain at this point because of the small differences. Greater customizing of the intervention combined with prolonged follow-up may lead to more-robust results.
确定一项积极主动的初级保健项目对初级保健中老年人日常功能的有效性。
单盲、三臂、整群随机对照试验,随访1年。
荷兰39家普通诊所的初级保健机构。
60岁及以上的社区居住者(N = 3,092)。
一项衰弱筛查干预,利用常规电子病历数据识别有不良事件风险的老年人,随后由全科医生提供常规护理;筛查干预后,由护士主导的护理项目,包括全面的老年评估、循证护理计划、护理协调和随访;常规护理。
主要结局是使用Katz-15量表测量的日常功能(6项日常生活活动(ADL)、8项工具性日常生活活动(IADL)、1项活动能力项目(范围0 - 15));分数越高表明依赖性越强。次要结局包括生活质量、初级保健会诊、住院、急诊就诊、养老院入住和死亡率。
在12个月时,两个干预组的参与者日常功能下降程度均低于常规护理组(Katz-15量表平均得分:筛查组,1.87,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.77 - 1.97;筛查及护士主导护理组,1.88,95% CI = 1.80 - 1.96;对照组,2.03,95% CI = 1.92 - 2.13;P = 0.03)。未观察到生活质量存在差异。
在1年随访时,两个干预组的参与者下降程度均低于对照组。尽管有统计学显著效果,但由于差异较小,目前临床相关性尚不确定。对干预措施进行更大程度的定制并延长随访时间可能会得出更可靠的结果。