Zuraw Bruce L, Christiansen Sandra C
Department of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Dr., Mail code 0732, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0732, USA.
San Diego Veterans Administration Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016 Oct;51(2):216-29. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8561-8.
Remarkable progress in understanding the pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms of hereditary angioedema has led to the development of effective treatment for this disorder. Progress in three separate areas has catalyzed our understanding of hereditary angioedema. The first is the recognition that HAE type I and type II result from a deficiency in the plasma level of functional C1 inhibitor. This observation has led to a detailed understanding of the SERPING1 mutations responsible for this deficiency as well as the molecular regulation of C1 inhibitor expression and function. The second is that the fundamental cause of swelling is enhanced contact system activation leading to increased generation of bradykinin. Substantial progress has been made in defining the parameters regulating bradykinin generation and catabolism as well as the receptors that transduce the biologic effects of kinins. The third is the understanding that tissue swelling in hereditary angioedema primarily involves the function of endothelial cell adherens junctions. This knowledge is driving increased attention to the role of endothelial biology in determining disease activity in hereditary angioedema. While there has been considerable progress made, large gaps still remain in our knowledge. Important areas that remain poorly understood include the factors that lead to very low plasma functional C1 inhibitor levels, the triggers of contact system activation in hereditary angioedema, and the role of the bradykinin B1 receptor. The phenotypic variability of hereditary angioedema has been extensively documented but never understood. The mechanisms discussed in this chapter likely contribute to this variability. Future progress in understanding these mechanisms should provide new means to improve the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.
在理解遗传性血管性水肿的病理生理学及潜在机制方面取得的显著进展,已促成了针对该病症的有效治疗方法的开发。三个不同领域的进展推动了我们对遗传性血管性水肿的理解。首先是认识到I型和II型遗传性血管性水肿是由于功能性C1抑制剂的血浆水平缺乏所致。这一观察结果使我们对导致这种缺乏的SERPING1突变以及C1抑制剂表达和功能的分子调节有了详细的了解。其次是肿胀的根本原因是接触系统激活增强,导致缓激肽生成增加。在确定调节缓激肽生成和分解代谢的参数以及转导激肽生物学效应的受体方面已取得了实质性进展。第三是认识到遗传性血管性水肿中的组织肿胀主要涉及内皮细胞黏附连接的功能。这一认识促使人们更加关注内皮生物学在遗传性血管性水肿疾病活动决定中的作用。虽然已经取得了相当大的进展,但我们的知识仍存在很大差距。仍未得到充分理解的重要领域包括导致血浆功能性C1抑制剂水平极低的因素、遗传性血管性水肿中接触系统激活的触发因素以及缓激肽B1受体的作用。遗传性血管性水肿的表型变异性已有广泛记录,但从未得到理解。本章讨论的机制可能导致了这种变异性。未来在理解这些机制方面取得的进展应能提供改善遗传性血管性水肿诊断和治疗的新方法。