Astbury Ruth, Shepherd Ashley, Cheyne Helen
Children and Families Teams, NW Sector - Glasgow City HSCP, Glasgow, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jan;26(1-2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13480. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
To explore the processes that support shared decision-making when health visitors and parents are creating plans to improve the well-being of babies and children.
Worldwide, there is a focus on promoting children's well-being to enhance the population health. Within the United Kingdom, health visitors have a key responsibility for working in partnership with parents to support this agenda. Despite evidence that the application of 'shared decision-making' frameworks can increase patient participation, improve patient satisfaction and improve health outcomes, there is limited research linking shared decision-making with health visitor practice.
A qualitative, descriptive study.
The study was undertaken in two phases: in Phase 1, data were collected by audio recording two health visitor-parent decision-making conversations, in the absence of the researcher, where decisions around planning for a baby or child were being made as part of usual care, and then the participants' experiences were sought through individual questionnaires. In Phase 2, semistructured interviews were conducted with nine health visitors and nine parents in relation to their recent experiences of planning care.
Evidence of supportive processes included having a shared understanding around the issue needing to be addressed; being able to identify interventions that were accessible for the family; engaging in decision-making through deep, meaningful conversations using sensitive and responsive approaches; and establishing positive relationships between health visitors and parents, significant others within the family and other professionals.
Despite evidence of strong, trusting relationships between parents and health visitors, there were times when shared decision-making was unable to take place due to the absence of supportive processes.
Health visitors are aware that planning interventions with parents can be complex. These findings indicate the value of using a shared decision-making framework to structure planning, as application of a framework identified the processes that support a collaborative approach in practice.
探讨在健康访视员与家长共同制定改善婴幼儿福祉计划时,支持共同决策的过程。
在全球范围内,人们关注促进儿童福祉以提升人口健康。在英国,健康访视员在与家长合作以支持这一议程方面负有关键责任。尽管有证据表明应用“共同决策”框架可提高患者参与度、改善患者满意度并改善健康结果,但将共同决策与健康访视员实践联系起来的研究有限。
一项定性描述性研究。
该研究分两个阶段进行:在第一阶段,在没有研究人员在场的情况下,通过音频记录两次健康访视员与家长的决策对话来收集数据,这些对话是在常规护理中围绕为婴幼儿制定计划而进行的决策,然后通过个人问卷寻求参与者的经验。在第二阶段,对九名健康访视员和九名家长就他们最近的护理计划经历进行了半结构化访谈。
支持性过程的证据包括对需要解决的问题有共同理解;能够确定家庭可获得的干预措施;通过使用敏感且响应性的方法进行深入、有意义的对话来参与决策;以及在健康访视员与家长、家庭中的重要他人和其他专业人员之间建立积极的关系。
尽管有证据表明家长与健康访视员之间存在牢固、信任的关系,但由于缺乏支持性过程,有时无法进行共同决策。
健康访视员意识到与家长规划干预措施可能很复杂。这些发现表明使用共同决策框架来构建规划的价值,因为框架的应用确定了在实践中支持协作方法的过程。