Respiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK.
Statistics and Programming, GSK, Stockley Park, UK.
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Sep;4(9):731-741. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30148-5. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
Inhaled corticosteroids are important in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but can slightly increase the risk of pneumonia in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Patients with circulating eosinophil counts of 2% or more of blood leucocytes respond better to inhaled corticosteroids than do those with counts of less than 2% and it was therefore postulated that blood eosinophil count might also have an effect on the risk of pneumonia in patients with COPD. In this post-hoc meta-analysis, we investigate whether a 2% threshold can identify patients who differ in their risk of pneumonia, irrespective of inhaled corticosteroid treatment.
From the GlaxoSmithKline trial registry, we selected randomised, double-blind, clinical trials of patients with COPD that had: inhaled corticosteroid arms (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone furoate and vilanterol); a control arm (not given inhaled fluticasone); and pre-randomisation measurements of blood eosinophil counts and were of at least 24 weeks in duration. With use of specified terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities we identified pneumonia adverse events in patient-level data. We calculated number of patients with pneumonia events, stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count (<2% vs ≥2% of blood leucocytes) and whether or not patients had received inhaled corticosteroids.
We identified ten trials (conducted between 1998 and 2011), with eosinophil count data available for 10 861 patients with COPD. 4043 patients had baseline blood eosinophil counts of less than 2% and 6818 patients had baseline blood eosinophil counts of 2% or more. 149 (3·7%) patients with counts less than 2% had one or more pneumonia adverse events compared with 215 (3·2%) with counts of 2% or more (hazard ratio [HR] 1·31; 95% CI 1·06-1·62). In patients not treated with inhaled corticosteroids, 40 (3·8%) patients with less than 2% blood eosinophil counts had a pneumonia event versus 48 (2·4%) with 2% or more blood eosinophils (HR 1·53; 95% CI 1·01-2·31). In patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids, events occurred in 107 (4·5%) versus 164 (3·9%; HR 1·25; 95% CI 0·98-1·60), respectively.
Using 2% baseline eosinophil count as a threshold, patients with COPD with lower blood eosinophil counts had more pneumonia events than did those with higher counts. The magnitude of this increased risk was small and should be further explored in large, prospective studies. These data should be considered when making treatment decisions, alongside existing evidence that patients with COPD and baseline blood eosinophil counts less than 2% have a poorer response to inhaled corticosteroids.
GlaxoSmithKline.
吸入性皮质类固醇在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗中非常重要,但在中重度 COPD 患者中会略微增加肺炎的风险。白细胞中循环嗜酸性粒细胞计数达到 2%或以上的患者对吸入性皮质类固醇的反应优于计数低于 2%的患者,因此推测血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数也可能对 COPD 患者的肺炎风险产生影响。在这项事后的荟萃分析中,我们研究了 2%的阈值是否可以识别出在吸入性皮质类固醇治疗中存在肺炎风险差异的患者。
我们从葛兰素史克试验登记处中选择了 COPD 患者的随机、双盲、临床试验,这些患者:吸入性皮质类固醇组(丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗或糠酸氟替卡松和维兰特罗);对照组(未给予吸入性氟替卡松);并且在随机分组前测量了血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数,且持续时间至少为 24 周。使用监管活动医学词典中的特定术语,我们在患者水平数据中识别出肺炎不良事件。我们根据基线血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数(<2%或≥2%的白细胞)和患者是否接受吸入性皮质类固醇治疗,计算肺炎事件的患者数量。
我们确定了十个试验(1998 年至 2011 年进行),有 10861 名 COPD 患者有嗜酸性粒细胞计数数据。4043 名患者的基线血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数<2%,6818 名患者的基线血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数为 2%或更高。在计数<2%的患者中,有 149 名(3.7%)患者发生了一个或多个肺炎不良事件,而计数为 2%或更高的患者中,有 215 名(3.2%)(危险比[HR]1.31;95%CI 1.06-1.62)。在未接受吸入性皮质类固醇治疗的患者中,计数<2%的患者中,有 40 名(3.8%)发生了肺炎事件,而计数为 2%或更高的患者中,有 48 名(2.4%)(HR 1.53;95%CI 1.01-2.31)。在接受吸入性皮质类固醇治疗的患者中,分别有 107 名(4.5%)和 164 名(3.9%)患者发生了事件(HR 1.25;95%CI 0.98-1.60)。
使用 2%的基线嗜酸性粒细胞计数作为阈值,血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数较低的 COPD 患者发生肺炎的事件多于计数较高的患者。这种风险增加的幅度很小,应在大型前瞻性研究中进一步探讨。在做出治疗决策时应考虑这些数据,同时考虑到现有的证据表明,血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数低于 2%的 COPD 患者对吸入性皮质类固醇的反应较差。
葛兰素史克公司。