• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对无保护左主干病变患者长期死亡率的影响:米兰和新东京(MITO)注册研究。

Impact of gender on long-term mortality in patients with unprotected left main disease: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry.

作者信息

Takagi Kensuke, Chieffo Alaide, Shannon Joanne, Naganuma Toru, Tahara Satoko, Fujino Yusuke, Latib Azeem, Montorfano Matteo, Carlino Mauro, Kawamoto Hiroyoshi, Nakamura Sunao, Colombo Antonio

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.007
PMID:27460302
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ULM is common, the impact of gender remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the impact of gender in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for unprotected left main (ULM) disease.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and August 2011, 1026 consecutive patients (212 women and 814 men) undergoing PCI using first or second generation DES for ULM stenosis were analyzed. Study endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Individual components of MACE and cardiac death were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Women had greater comorbidity and more complex lesions, resulting in a higher incidence of cardiac death, TLR and MI {[HR, 1.94 (95% CI, 1.22-3.09, p=0.005)], [HR, 1.31 (95% CI 0.96-1.81), p=0.09] and [HR, 2.04 (95% CI, 0.98-4.25), p=0.06], respectively}. Propensity score matching identified 131 matched pairs. There were no differences in MACE [HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.68-1.61, p=0.85)], all-cause death [HR, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.52-1.77), p=0.89] or MI [HR, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.21-3.50, p=0.84)]. However, cardiac death [HR, 2.70 (95% CI, 0.98-7.49, p=0.056] and TLR [HR, 1.62 (95% CI, 0.93-2.84), p=0.09] showed a trend to being higher in women compared to men.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ULM disease, women had greater comorbidity and more complex lesions, resulting in an increased risk of clinical events. However after propensity matching, there was no difference in the occurrence of MACE but cardiac death showed a trend to being higher in women compared to men.

摘要

背景

尽管对无保护左主干(ULM)进行经皮介入治疗(PCI)很常见,但性别影响仍不明确。本研究旨在阐明性别对接受药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗无保护左主干(ULM)疾病患者的影响。

方法

对2002年4月至2011年8月期间连续1026例接受第一代或第二代DES治疗ULM狭窄的患者(212例女性和814例男性)进行分析。研究终点包括主要不良心脏事件(MACE),定义为全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶病变血运重建(TLR)的复合事件。还评估了MACE的各个组成部分和心源性死亡。

结果

女性合并症更多且病变更复杂,导致心源性死亡、TLR和MI的发生率更高{[风险比(HR),1.94(95%置信区间,1.22 - 3.09,p = 0.005)],[HR,1.31(95%置信区间0.96 - 1.81),p = 0.09]和[HR,2.04(95%置信区间,0.98 - 4.25),p = 0.06],分别}。倾向评分匹配确定了131对匹配病例。MACE[HR,1.04(95%置信区间,0.68 - 1.61,p = 0.85)]、全因死亡[HR,0.96(95%置信区间,0.52 - 1.77),p = 0.89]或MI[HR,0.84(95%置信区间,0.21 - 3.50),p = 0.84]方面无差异。然而,女性的心源性死亡[HR,2.70(95%置信区间,0.98 - 7.49,p = 0.056)]和TLR[HR,1.62(95%置信区间,0.93 - 2.84),p = 0.09]与男性相比有升高趋势。

结论

在ULM疾病患者中,女性合并症更多且病变更复杂,导致临床事件风险增加。然而,倾向匹配后,MACE的发生率无差异,但女性的心源性死亡与男性相比有升高趋势。

相似文献

1
Impact of gender on long-term mortality in patients with unprotected left main disease: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry.性别对无保护左主干病变患者长期死亡率的影响:米兰和新东京(MITO)注册研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
3
Impact of a combination of full coverage stenting and proximal optimization technique on long term outcome for unprotected distal left main disease.全覆膜支架置入术与近端优化技术联合应用对无保护左主干远端病变长期预后的影响
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes following drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected distal trifurcation left main disease: the Milan-New Tokyo (MITO) registry.药物洗脱支架植入治疗无保护左主干远端三分支病变的长期临床结局:米兰-新东京(MITO)注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar 1;83(4):530-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25174. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
5
Comparative long-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting in ostial left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE registry.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗开口左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期疗效和安全性比较:MAIN-COMPARE 注册分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):206-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23369. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
6
Comparison Between 1- and 2-Stent Strategies in Unprotected Distal Left Main Disease: The Milan and New-Tokyo Registry.无保护左主干远端病变单支架与双支架策略的比较:米兰和新东京注册研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003359.
7
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.DELTA 注册研究:非保护左主干冠状动脉开口/中段病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期临床结果:多中心注册研究评估左主干病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
8
5-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions the Milan experience.药物洗脱支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变的 5 年结果:米兰经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.014.
9
First generation versus new generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) registry.第一代与新一代药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉开口/中段病变:米兰和新东京(MITO)注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb 15;85(3):E63-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25624. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
10
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the KoRean wOmen'S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE).冠状动脉疾病中的性别差异:来自韩国女性胸痛注册研究(KoROSE)的见解
Korean Circ J. 2023 Oct;53(10):655-676. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0205.
2
Operator-patient sex discordance and periprocedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (from the ORPKI Polish National Registry).操作者与患者性别不一致及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的围手术期结局(来自波兰国家ORPKI注册研究)
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023 Jun;19(2):113-118. doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.129208. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
3
Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease.
缺血性心脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的性别差异
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Mar 2;18:e06. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.24. eCollection 2023.
4
Time-Dependent Impact of Sex on the Long-Term Outcomes After Left Main Revascularization.时间依赖性性别对左主干血运重建后长期结局的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e021720. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021720. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
Sex Differences in Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Left Main Disease: From the DELTA Registries.左主干疾病行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的性别差异:来自 DELTA 注册研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e022320. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022320. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
A Personalized Approach to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Left Main Coronary Artery-Is the Female Gender Associated with Worse Outcomes?左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的个性化方法——女性性别是否与更差的预后相关?
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 20;11(6):581. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060581.
7
Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease.无保护左主干病变男性和女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果比较。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Mar 28;18(3):168-174. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004.