• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无保护左主干病变男性和女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果比较。

Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease.

作者信息

Liu Sheng-Wen, Guan Chang-Dong, Hu Feng-Huan, Chen Jue, Dou Ke-Fei, Yang Wei-Xian, Wu Yong-Jian, Yang Yue-Jin, Xu Bo, Qiao Shu-Bin

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Catheterization Laboratories, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Mar 28;18(3):168-174. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004.

DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004
PMID:33907546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8047187/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) is increasing strategy in coronary artery patients. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the impact of sex on outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2015, there were 3,960 patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI at our institution, including 3,121 (78.8%) men and 839 (21.2%) women. The clinical outcome included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization), all-cause death, MI, revascularization at three years follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women had not significantly different MACE (14.7% . 14.6%, = 0.89, all-cause death (3.5% . 3.7%, = 0.76), MI (5.0% . 4.3%, = 0.38), revascularization (9.1% . 8.9%, = 0.86), respectively. After adjustment, rates of MACE (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.24-1.81; < 0.0001) and all-cause death (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09-2.48; = 0.017) occurred more frequently in male patients, as well as revascularization (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.16-1.85; = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, compared to men, women undergoing ULMCAD PCI have better outcomes of MACE, all-cause death, and revascularization.

摘要

背景

在无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病(ULMCAD)患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在冠状动脉疾病患者中是一种日益增加的治疗策略。然而,关于性别对接受ULMCAD PCI患者结局的影响,目前尚缺乏了解。

方法

2004年1月至2015年12月,我院有3960例患者接受了ULMCAD PCI,其中男性3121例(78.8%),女性839例(21.2%)。临床结局包括主要不良心脏事件(MACE)(全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和血运重建的复合事件)、全因死亡、MI以及三年随访时的血运重建情况。

结果

与男性相比,女性的MACE(14.7%对14.6%,P = 0.89)、全因死亡(3.5%对3.7%,P = 0.76)、MI(5.0%对4.3%,P = 0.38)、血运重建(9.1%对8.9%,P = 0.86)无显著差异。调整后,男性患者发生MACE(HR = 1.49;95%CI:1.24 - 1.81;P < 0.0001)、全因死亡(HR = 1.65;95%CI:1.09 - 2.48;P = 0.017)以及血运重建(HR = 1.46;95%CI:1.16 - 1.85;P = 0.001)的频率更高。

结论

在本分析中,与男性相比,接受ULMCAD PCI的女性在MACE、全因死亡和血运重建方面有更好的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7f6/8047187/1b2b5c393c80/jgc-18-3-168-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7f6/8047187/1b2b5c393c80/jgc-18-3-168-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7f6/8047187/1b2b5c393c80/jgc-18-3-168-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease.无保护左主干病变男性和女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果比较。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Mar 28;18(3):168-174. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004.
2
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
3
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局:6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
5
Four-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome.稳定性心绞痛和急性冠脉综合征患者无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的四年结果。
Rom J Intern Med. 2021 May 8;59(2):141-150. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2020-0042. Print 2021 Jun 1.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graftinge Among Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Era (From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3).新一代药物洗脱支架时代无保护左主干病变患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较(来自 CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 注册研究队列-3)。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;145:47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.078. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
8
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - 5-Year Outcome From CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2 - .非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较——CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG注册队列2的5年结果
Circ J. 2015;79(6):1282-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0034. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
9
Effect of increasing age on percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in older adults with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.年龄增加对老年无保护左主干病变患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的影响:一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1071-1078. doi: 10.1002/clc.23253. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Comparison of long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的长期预后(来自 CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 注册研究队列-2)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 1;110(7):924-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction.心肌梗死体内小鼠模型的指南。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Dec 1;321(6):H1056-H1073. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00459.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
A Sex-Based Analysis From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study (VeRy Thin Stents for Patients With Left MAIn or BifurcatioN in Real Life) on Left Main Stenting.RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究(真实现场中左主干或分叉病变患者使用非常薄支架)的性别分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Sep;32(9):342-346. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00077. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
3
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
4
Safety and Effectiveness of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.第二代药物洗脱支架在左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中的安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 27;71(8):832-841. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.032.
5
Sex Differences in the Presentation and Perception of Symptoms Among Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Evidence from the VIRGO Study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients).年轻心肌梗死患者症状表现和感知的性别差异:VIRGO 研究的证据(恢复的变化:性别对年轻 AMI 患者结局的影响)。
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):781-790. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031650.
6
Sex differences in left main coronary artery stenting: Different characteristics but similar outcomes for women compared with men.左主干冠状动脉支架置入术的性别差异:女性与男性相比,具有不同的特征但结局相似。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 15;253:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.051.
7
Sex differences in cardiovascular disease - Impact on care and outcomes.心血管疾病中的性别差异——对治疗及预后的影响
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2017 Jul;46:46-70. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Sex differences in plaque characteristics by intravascular imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病患者血管内影像学检查的斑块特征的性别差异。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jun 20;13(3):320-328. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00361.
9
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄(NOBLE):一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.依维莫司洗脱支架或旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227. Epub 2016 Oct 31.