Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
In 2009 the first European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guideline for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was launched. Since then newer tests for diagnosing CDI have become available, especially nucleic acid amplification tests. The main objectives of this update of the guidance document are to summarize the currently available evidence concerning laboratory diagnosis of CDI and to formulate and revise recommendations to optimize CDI testing. This update is essential to improve the diagnosis of CDI and to improve uniformity in CDI diagnosis for surveillance purposes among Europe. An electronic search for literature concerning the laboratory diagnosis of CDI was performed. Studies evaluating a commercial laboratory test compared to a reference test were also included in a meta-analysis. The commercial tests that were evaluated included enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) detecting glutamate dehydrogenase, EIAs detecting toxins A and B and nucleic acid amplification tests. Recommendations were formulated by an executive committee, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence were graded using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. No single commercial test can be used as a stand-alone test for diagnosing CDI as a result of inadequate positive predictive values at low CDI prevalence. Therefore, the use of a two-step algorithm is recommended. Samples without free toxin detected by toxins A and B EIA but with positive glutamate dehydrogenase EIA, nucleic acid amplification test or toxigenic culture results need clinical evaluation to discern CDI from asymptomatic carriage.
2009 年,欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)发布了首个用于诊断艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的指南。此后,出现了用于诊断 CDI 的新检测方法,尤其是核酸扩增检测。本指南更新的主要目的是总结目前有关 CDI 实验室诊断的证据,并制定和修改建议以优化 CDI 检测。本次更新对于提高 CDI 的诊断水平以及提高欧洲 CDI 监测诊断的一致性至关重要。对 CDI 实验室诊断的文献进行了电子检索。还对评估商业实验室检测与参考检测的比较的研究进行了荟萃分析。评估的商业检测包括检测谷氨酸脱氢酶的酶免疫测定法(EIA)、检测毒素 A 和 B 的 EIA 以及核酸扩增检测。由执行委员会制定了建议,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)系统对建议的强度和证据质量进行分级。由于在 CDI 低流行率时阳性预测值不足,没有单一的商业检测可作为诊断 CDI 的独立检测方法。因此,建议使用两步算法。未通过毒素 A 和 B EIA 检测到游离毒素但谷氨酸脱氢酶 EIA、核酸扩增检测或产毒培养阳性的样本需要进行临床评估,以区分 CDI 与无症状携带。