Martins Belmira D C P C C, Oliveira Reinaldo A, Cataneo Antonio J M
Program on General Basis of Surgery,Botucatu School of Medicine,São Paulo State University, Universidade Estadual Paulista,São Paulo,Brazil.
Department of Forensic Medicine and Medical Ethics,São Paulo University, Universidade Estadual Paulista,São Paulo,Brazil.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Jun;15(3):376-383. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000584. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
The purpose of our systematic review was to determine whether the introduction of palliative care (PC) teams reduces length of stay and/or mortality for terminally ill patients (TIPs) in an intensive care unit (ICU).
We hoped to examine studies that compared TIPs in an ICU who received end-of-life care following implementation of a PC team (intervention group) to those who received care where PC teams had not yet been introduced (control group). We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL (search conducted in December of 2015) without language restrictions. Our outcome measures were length of stay in an ICU, presented as an average difference with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI 95%), and mortality in the ICU, presented as a risk ratio with a corresponding CI 95%. Two of our authors independently extracted all of the data.
Of the 399 publications identified, 27 were selected for full-text analysis and 19 were excluded, leaving 8 articles for inclusion, which involved a total of 7,846 patients. A metaanalysis of mortality in the ICU was conducted with four studies. Lower mortality was found in the intervention group: risk ratio = 0.78 (CI 95% = 0.70-0.87), p < 0.00001, I 2 = 18%. Length of stay in the ICU was presented as a mean and standard deviation in four studies, and the result was a reduction of ~2.5 days in the length of stay with application of the intervention: mean = -2.44 days (CI 95% = -4.41 to -0.48), p = 0.01, I 2 = 86%.
Introduction of palliative care teams can reduce mortality rates in the ICU, and perhaps shorten length of stay in the ICU for terminally ill patients.
我们进行系统评价的目的是确定引入姑息治疗(PC)团队是否能缩短重症监护病房(ICU)中晚期绝症患者(TIPs)的住院时间和/或降低其死亡率。
我们希望研究那些将实施PC团队后在ICU接受临终关怀的TIPs(干预组)与尚未引入PC团队时接受护理的TIPs(对照组)进行比较的研究。我们通过PubMed、LILACS、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL检索了MEDLINE(检索于2015年12月进行),无语言限制。我们的结局指标是ICU住院时间,以平均差异及相应的95%置信区间(CI 95%)表示,以及ICU死亡率,以风险比及相应的CI 95%表示。我们的两位作者独立提取了所有数据。
在识别出的399篇出版物中,27篇被选进行全文分析,19篇被排除,最终纳入8篇文章,共涉及7846名患者。对四项研究进行了ICU死亡率的荟萃分析。干预组的死亡率较低:风险比=0.78(CI 95%=0.70 - 0.87),p<0.00001,I² = 18%。四项研究给出了ICU住院时间的均值和标准差,结果显示应用干预措施后住院时间缩短了约2.5天:均值=-2.44天(CI 95%=-4.41至-0.48),p = 0.01,I² = 86%。
引入姑息治疗团队可降低ICU中的死亡率,或许还能缩短晚期绝症患者在ICU的住院时间。