Yazdizadeh Bahareh, Majdzadeh Reza, Janani Leila, Mohtasham Farideh, Nikooee Sima, Mousavi Abdmohammad, Najafi Farid, Atabakzadeh Maryam, Bazrafshan Azam, Zare Morteza, Karami Manoochehr
Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 26;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0129-9.
In recent years, Iran has made significant developments in the field of health sciences. However, the question is whether this considerable increase has affected public health. The research budget has always been negligible and unsustainable in developing countries. Hence, using the Payback Framework, we conducted this study to evaluate the impact of health research in Iran.
By using a cross-sectional method and two-stage stratified cluster sampling, the projects were randomly selected from six medical universities. A questionnaire was designed according to the Payback Framework and completed by the principle investigators of the randomly selected projects.
The response rate was 70.4%. Ten point twenty-four percent (10.24%) of the studies had been ordered by a knowledge user organization. The average number of articles published in journals per project was 0.96, and half of the studies had no articles published in Scopus. The results of 12% of the studies had been used in systematic review articles and the same proportion had been utilized in clinical or public health guidelines. The results of 5.3% of the studies had been implemented in the Health Ministry's policymaking. 62% of the studies were expected to affect health directly, 38% of them had been implemented, and among the latter 60% had achieved the expected results. Concerning the economic impacts, the most common expected impact was the reduction of 'days of work missed because of illness or disability' and impact on personal and health system costs. About 36% of these studies had been implemented, and 61% had achieved the expected impact.
In most aspects, the status of research impact needs improvement. A comparison of Iran's ranking of knowledge creation and knowledge impact in the Global Innovation Index confirms these findings. The most important problems identified were, not conducting research based on national needs, and the lack of implementation of research results.
近年来,伊朗在健康科学领域取得了重大进展。然而,问题在于这种显著增长是否对公众健康产生了影响。在发展中国家,研究预算一直微不足道且不可持续。因此,我们运用回报框架开展了本研究,以评估伊朗健康研究的影响。
采用横断面方法和两阶段分层整群抽样,从六所医科大学中随机选取项目。根据回报框架设计了一份问卷,并由随机选取项目的主要研究者完成。
回复率为70.4%。10.24%的研究是由知识用户组织委托进行的。每个项目在期刊上发表文章的平均数量为0.96,且一半的研究在Scopus上没有发表文章。12%的研究结果被用于系统评价文章,相同比例被用于临床或公共卫生指南。5.3%的研究结果已在卫生部的政策制定中得到实施。62%的研究预计会直接影响健康,其中38%已得到实施,在后者中60%取得了预期结果。关于经济影响,最常见的预期影响是减少“因病或残疾而错过的工作日”以及对个人和卫生系统成本的影响。这些研究中约36%已得到实施,61%取得了预期影响。
在大多数方面,研究影响的状况需要改进。伊朗在全球创新指数中知识创造和知识影响排名的比较证实了这些发现。确定的最重要问题是,研究未基于国家需求开展,且研究结果缺乏实施。