Suppr超能文献

确定循证卫生政策制定中的挑战的系统评价与政策对话:SASHA研究的结果

Systematic review and policy dialogue to determine challenges in evidence-informed health policy-making: findings of the SASHA study.

作者信息

Yazdizadeh Bahareh, Sajadi Haniye Sadat, Mohtasham Farideh, Mohseni Mahsa, Majdzadeh Reza

机构信息

Knowledge Utilization Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Knowledge Utilization Research Center, University Research and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 4;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00717-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various interventions have been undertaken in Iran to promote evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP). Identifying the challenges in EIHP is the first step toward strengthening EIHP in each country through the design of tailored interventions. Therefore, the current study was conducted to synthesize the results of earlier studies and to finalize the list of barriers to EIHP in Iran.

METHODS

To identify the barriers to EIHP in Iran, two steps were taken: a systematic review and policy dialogue. To conduct the systematic review, three Iranian databases and PubMed, Health Systems Evidence (HSE), Embase, and Scopus were searched. The reference lists of included papers and documentation from some local organizations were hand-searched. Upon conducting the systematic review, given the significance of stakeholders in clarifying the problem of EIHP, policy dialogue was used to complete the list previously extracted and to do advocacy. Selection criteria for the stakeholders included influential and informed individuals from knowledge-producing, knowledge-utilizing, and knowledge-brokering organizations. Semi-structured interviews were held with three important absent stakeholders.

RESULTS

Challenges specific to Iran that were identified included the lack of integration of the health ministry and the medical universities, lack of ties between health knowledge utilization organizations, failure to establish long-term research plans, neglect of national research needs at the time of recruiting human resources in knowledge-producing organizations, and duplication and lack of coordination in routine data obtained from surveillance systems, disease registration systems, and censuses. It seems that some challenges are common across countries, including neglecting the importance of inter- and intra-disciplinary studies, the capacity of policy-makers and managers to utilize evidence, the criteria for evaluating the performance of policy-makers, managers, and academic members, the absence of long-term programmes in knowledge-utilizing organizations, the rapid replacement of policy-makers and managers, and lack of use of evaluation studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we tried to identify the challenges regarding EIHP in Iran using a systematic review and policy dialogue approach. This is the first step toward determining the best interventions to improve evidence-informed policy-making in each country, because these challenges are contextual and need to be investigated contextually.

摘要

背景

伊朗已采取各种干预措施来促进循证卫生政策制定(EIHP)。识别EIHP中的挑战是通过设计针对性干预措施在每个国家加强EIHP的第一步。因此,开展本研究以综合早期研究结果并确定伊朗EIHP的障碍清单。

方法

为识别伊朗EIHP的障碍,采取了两个步骤:系统评价和政策对话。为进行系统评价,检索了三个伊朗数据库以及PubMed、卫生系统证据(HSE)、Embase和Scopus。对纳入论文的参考文献列表以及一些当地组织的文档进行了手工检索。在进行系统评价后,鉴于利益相关者在澄清EIHP问题方面的重要性,采用政策对话来完善先前提取的清单并进行宣传。利益相关者的选择标准包括来自知识生产、知识利用和知识中介组织的有影响力且见多识广的个人。与三位重要的未参与的利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

识别出的伊朗特有的挑战包括卫生部与医科大学缺乏整合、卫生知识利用组织之间缺乏联系、未制定长期研究计划、知识生产组织在招聘人力资源时忽视国家研究需求,以及从监测系统、疾病登记系统和人口普查获得的常规数据存在重复和缺乏协调的情况。似乎有些挑战在各国普遍存在,包括忽视跨学科和学科内研究的重要性、政策制定者和管理者利用证据的能力、评估政策制定者、管理者和学术人员绩效的标准、知识利用组织缺乏长期计划、政策制定者和管理者的快速更替,以及缺乏对评价研究的利用。

结论

在本研究中,我们试图采用系统评价和政策对话方法识别伊朗EIHP方面的挑战。这是确定改善各国循证政策制定的最佳干预措施的第一步,因为这些挑战因具体情况而异,需要根据具体情况进行调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验