Lin Longting, Cheng Xin, Bivard Andrew, Levi Christopher R, Dong Qiang, Parsons Mark W
1 School of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
3 Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Jun;37(6):2125-2136. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16661338. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
To derive the reperfusion index best predicting clinical outcome of ischemic stroke patients, we retrospectively analysed the acute and 24-h computed tomography perfusion data of 116 patients, collected from two centres equipped with whole-brain computed tomography perfusion. Reperfusion index was defined by the percentage of the ischemic region reperfused from acute to 24-h computed tomography perfusion. Recanalization was graded by arterial occlusive lesion system. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of reperfusion and recanalization in predicting good clinical outcome, defined as modified Rankin Score of 0-2 at 90 days. Among previous reported reperfusion measurements, reperfusion of the Tmax>6 s region resulted in higher prognostic value than recanalization at predicting good clinical outcome (area under the curve = 0.88 and 0.74, respectively, p = 0.002). Successful reperfusion of the Tmax>6 s region (≥60%) had 89% sensitivity and 78% specificity in predicting good clinical outcome. A reperfusion index defined by Tmax>2 s or by mean transit time>145% had much lower area under the curve in comparison to Tmax>6 s measurement (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), and had no significant difference to recanalization at predicting clinical outcome (p = 0.58 and 0.63, respectively). In conclusion, reperfusion index calculated by Tmax>6 s is a stronger predictor of clinical outcome than recanalization or other reperfusion measures.
为得出最能预测缺血性中风患者临床结局的再灌注指数,我们回顾性分析了116例患者的急性和24小时计算机断层扫描灌注数据,这些数据来自两个配备全脑计算机断层扫描灌注设备的中心。再灌注指数定义为从急性到24小时计算机断层扫描灌注时缺血区域再灌注的百分比。再通情况根据动脉闭塞病变系统进行分级。进行了受试者工作特征分析,以评估再灌注和再通在预测良好临床结局(定义为90天时改良Rankin评分0 - 2分)方面的预后价值。在先前报道的再灌注测量中,Tmax>6秒区域的再灌注在预测良好临床结局方面比再通具有更高的预后价值(曲线下面积分别为0.88和0.74,p = 0.002)。Tmax>6秒区域成功再灌注(≥60%)在预测良好临床结局方面具有89%的敏感性和78%的特异性。与Tmax>6秒测量相比,由Tmax>2秒或平均通过时间>145%定义的再灌注指数的曲线下面积要低得多(分别为p < 0.001和p = 0.003),并且在预测临床结局方面与再通无显著差异(分别为p = 0.58和0.63)。总之,由Tmax>6秒计算得出的再灌注指数比再通或其他再灌注测量更能预测临床结局。