Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa , via Moruzzi 13, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick , Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL Coventry, U.K.
J Org Chem. 2016 Sep 2;81(17):7725-32. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01416. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
In 1997, Sandström and co-workers reported the case of two chiral spiro compounds with very similar skeletons but showing almost mirror-image electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra for the corresponding absolute configuration. The paper has been often cited as a proof and good educational example of the pronounced sensitivity of ECD toward molecular conformation, and a clear warning against the use of ECD spectral correlations to assign absolute configurations. Although both concepts remain valid, they are not exemplified by the quoted paper. We demonstrate that the original configurational assignment of one compound was wrong and revise it by using TDDFT calculations. The main reason for the observed failure is the use of the matrix method, a popular approach to predict ECD spectra of compounds which can be treated with an independent system approximation (ISA), including proteins. Using a modern version of the matrix method, we demonstrate that the ISA is not valid for the title compound. Even in the absence of apparent conjugation between the component chromophores, the validity of the ISA should never be taken for granted and the effective extent of orbital overlap should always be verified.
1997 年,Sandström 及其同事报道了两个手性螺环化合物的案例,它们的骨架非常相似,但相应的绝对构型表现出几乎镜像的电子圆二色性(ECD)光谱。这篇论文经常被引用为 ECD 对分子构象的强烈敏感性的证明和良好的教育范例,并清楚地警告不要将 ECD 光谱相关性用于确定绝对构型。尽管这两个概念仍然有效,但引用的论文并没有例证它们。我们证明了一种化合物的原始构型分配是错误的,并通过使用 TDDFT 计算进行了修正。观察到的失败的主要原因是使用矩阵方法,这是一种预测可以用独立体系近似(ISA)处理的化合物 ECD 光谱的常用方法,包括蛋白质。我们使用矩阵方法的现代版本证明,对于标题化合物,ISA 是无效的。即使在组成发色团之间没有明显的共轭,ISA 的有效性也绝不能被视为理所当然,并且始终应验证轨道重叠的有效程度。