Suppr超能文献

学术健康中心教员的程序能力:挑战与未来方向。

Procedural Competence Among Faculty in Academic Health Centers: Challenges and Future Directions.

作者信息

Vaisman Alon, Cram Peter

机构信息

A. Vaisman is a licensed physician in internal medicine and current trainee in adult infectious diseases, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network, and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. P. Cram is director, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, and professor of medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):31-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001327.

Abstract

Increasingly, faculty are taking on more direct responsibilities in patient care because of reductions in resident work hours, increasing admissions, and an endless push for efficiency. Furthermore, the rise of different career tracks in academia (i.e., patient care, research, education, or administration) and a drive for efficiency and subspecialization have placed additional strains on academic health centers. Combined, these factors have led to faculty increasingly being placed in the position of supervising bedside procedures that they may have not performed in years or with tools they have never trained with at all. Despite these challenges, procedural retraining for faculty remains nonstandardized across most academic health centers. The resulting lack of procedural competence among faculty creates a number of challenges for the different parties involved.In this Perspective, the authors discuss the nature of the current problem of faculty procedural competence and the challenges it poses for faculty and academic health centers, medicolegal ramifications, and the challenges it poses to the faculty-trainee relationship. The authors then suggest several strategies to delineate and resolve this problem. To delineate the problem, they suggest single-center surveys to address the current paucity of data. To resolve the problem, they suggest the consideration of some modest, low-cost interventions such as having backup systems in place for procedure supervision (e.g., procedural service teams or interventional radiologists) and providing faculty with opportunities to retrain.

摘要

由于住院医师工作时长的减少、入院人数的增加以及对效率的不懈追求,教师在患者护理方面承担的直接责任越来越多。此外,学术界不同职业发展路径(即患者护理、研究、教育或管理)的兴起以及对效率和专科化的追求给学术健康中心带来了额外的压力。综合这些因素,教师越来越多地被置于监督床边操作的位置,而这些操作他们可能已经多年未做,或者使用的工具他们根本从未接受过培训。尽管存在这些挑战,但在大多数学术健康中心,针对教师的程序再培训仍未标准化。教师缺乏程序能力给相关各方带来了诸多挑战。在这篇观点文章中,作者讨论了教师程序能力当前问题的本质、它给教师和学术健康中心带来的挑战、法医学后果以及它对教师与受训人员关系构成的挑战。作者随后提出了几种界定和解决此问题的策略。为了界定问题,他们建议进行单中心调查以解决当前数据匮乏的问题。为了解决问题,他们建议考虑一些适度的、低成本的干预措施,比如为程序监督设置备用系统(如程序服务团队或介入放射科医生),并为教师提供再培训的机会。

相似文献

2
Academic health centers and health care reform.
Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9):648-53. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00002.
3
Characteristics of Independent Academic Medical Center Faculty.独立学术医疗中心教员的特征
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e48-e53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Litigation involving medical faculty and academic medical centers, 1950-1991.
Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00002.
8
Perspective: Toward a competency framework for faculty.观点:构建教师能力框架
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10):1204-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822bd524.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验