• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引言:在多发性硬化症中我们是否需要多方利益相关者座谈会?

Introduction: Do we need multi-stakeholder colloquia in MS?

作者信息

Vermersch Patrick, Smets Louis, Gold Ralf

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Lille, CHRU de Lille, Lille International Research Inflammation Center (LIRIC), INSRRM U995, FHU Imminent, Lille, France

Managing Director at Ismar Healthcare, Lier, Belgium.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):4-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650740.

DOI:10.1177/1352458516650740
PMID:27465611
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the increasingly complex environment of MS there is a need for better cross-talk and communication between the different stakeholders who each address MS according to their own perspective.

OBJECTIVE & METHODS: The first and second Pan-European MS Multi-stakeholder Colloquia were specifically set-up for this.

RESULTS

In May 2014 and May 2015, the different stakeholders in MS (patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, payers and pharmaceutical industry professionals) met to present and discuss each other's perspective, formulate 10 integrated Calls to Actions (first Colloquium) and discuss guidance propositions/recommendations developed by working groups for the Calls to Action (second Colloquium).

CONCLUSION

The perspectives of the different stakeholders and the 10 integrated Calls to Action are summarised in this supplement.

摘要

背景

在日益复杂的多发性硬化症环境中,不同利益相关者之间需要更好的相互交流与沟通,他们各自从自身角度应对多发性硬化症。

目的与方法

为此专门举办了首届和第二届泛欧洲多发性硬化症多利益相关者座谈会。

结果

2014年5月和2015年5月,多发性硬化症的不同利益相关者(患者、医疗保健专业人员、监管机构、支付方和制药行业专业人员)齐聚一堂,展示并讨论彼此的观点,制定了10项综合行动呼吁(首届座谈会),并讨论了各工作组为行动呼吁制定的指导建议(第二届座谈会)。

结论

本增刊总结了不同利益相关者的观点以及10项综合行动呼吁。

相似文献

1
Introduction: Do we need multi-stakeholder colloquia in MS?引言:在多发性硬化症中我们是否需要多方利益相关者座谈会?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):4-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650740.
2
Conclusions: Calls to action for improving the life of MS patients and their families.结论:呼吁采取行动改善多发性硬化症患者及其家庭的生活。
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):71-7. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650738.
3
The importance of a multi-disciplinary perspective and patient activation programmes in MS management.多学科视角和患者激活计划在多发性硬化症管理中的重要性。
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):34-46. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650741.
4
The patient's perspective: How to create awareness for improving access to care and treatment of MS patients?患者视角:如何提高对改善多发性硬化症患者获得护理和治疗机会的认识?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):9-17. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650742.
5
Preface.前言。
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):2-3. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650745.
6
The payer's perspective: What is the burden of MS and how should the patient's perspective be integrated in health technology assessment conducted for taking decisions on access to care and treatment?支付方的观点:多发性硬化症的负担是什么,以及在进行卫生技术评估以决定获得护理和治疗的机会时,应如何将患者的观点纳入其中?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):60-70. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650743.
7
The clinical perspective: How to personalise treatment in MS and how may biomarkers including imaging contribute to this?临床视角:如何实现多发性硬化症的个性化治疗,以及包括影像学在内的生物标志物对此能有何帮助?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):18-33. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650739.
8
The regulator's perspective: How should new therapies and follow-on products for MS be clinically evaluated in the future?监管机构的观点:未来多发性硬化症的新疗法和后续产品应如何进行临床评估?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):47-59. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650744.
9
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Content validity of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for multiple sclerosis from the perspective of speech and language therapists.从言语和语言治疗师角度看多发性硬化症综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的内容效度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):672-86. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12086. Epub 2014 Aug 18.