• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结论:呼吁采取行动改善多发性硬化症患者及其家庭的生活。

Conclusions: Calls to action for improving the life of MS patients and their families.

作者信息

Vermersch Patrick, Smets Louis, Gold Ralf

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Lille, CHRU de Lille, Lille International Research Inflammation Center (LIRIC), INSRRM U995, FHU Imminent, Lille, France

Managing Director at Ismar Healthcare, Lier, Belgium.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):71-7. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650738.

DOI:10.1177/1352458516650738
PMID:27465617
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The first and second Pan-European MS Multi-stakeholder Colloquia were set up to increase cross-talk and communication between the different stakeholders in MS and developed joint Calls to Action to improve (equal) access to quality care and treatment for MS in Europe.

OBJECTIVE & METHODS: To summarise the 10 integrated and interrelated Calls to Action developed.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Call 1: increase awareness in the European community about the burden MS places on patients, caregivers and society. Call 2: improve communication towards the European community on the direct and indirect cost burden of MS. Call 3: perform patient research to (re)define treatment goals/endpoints from a humanistic/patient perspective point of view. Call 4: develop new tools to better capture the total clinical burden of MS. Call 5: develop a protocol for standardisation of MRI for optimising its use as a marker of disability progression in MS. Call 6: support research to find other (molecular) biomarkers which can predict long-term disability progression and (monitor) individual treatment response. Call 7: align CHMP/EMA and HTA decision-making process. Call 8: develop separate EMA guidelines for evaluating follow-on products of non-biological complex drugs. Call 9: support people with MS remaining (physically) active and at work and stimulate the implementation of specialised care centres. Call 10: support the continuation of multi-stakeholder colloquia.

摘要

背景

首届和第二届泛欧多发性硬化症多方利益相关者座谈会的设立,旨在加强多发性硬化症领域不同利益相关者之间的交流与沟通,并制定联合行动呼吁,以改善(平等)欧洲多发性硬化症患者获得优质护理和治疗的机会。

目的与方法

总结制定的10项相互关联的综合行动呼吁。

结果与结论

呼吁1:提高欧洲社会对多发性硬化症给患者、护理人员和社会带来负担的认识。呼吁2:加强向欧洲社会宣传多发性硬化症的直接和间接成本负担。呼吁3:开展患者研究,从人文/患者视角(重新)定义治疗目标/终点。呼吁4:开发新工具,更好地衡量多发性硬化症的总体临床负担。呼吁5:制定磁共振成像标准化方案,以优化其作为多发性硬化症残疾进展标志物的应用。呼吁6:支持开展研究,寻找其他(分子)生物标志物,以预测长期残疾进展并(监测)个体治疗反应。呼吁7:协调人用药品委员会/欧洲药品管理局与卫生技术评估的决策过程。呼吁8:制定欧洲药品管理局单独的指南,用于评估非生物复杂药物的后续产品。呼吁9:支持多发性硬化症患者保持(身体)活跃和继续工作,并推动建立专业护理中心。呼吁10:支持多方利益相关者座谈会的持续开展。

相似文献

1
Conclusions: Calls to action for improving the life of MS patients and their families.结论:呼吁采取行动改善多发性硬化症患者及其家庭的生活。
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):71-7. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650738.
2
Introduction: Do we need multi-stakeholder colloquia in MS?引言:在多发性硬化症中我们是否需要多方利益相关者座谈会?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):4-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650740.
3
The payer's perspective: What is the burden of MS and how should the patient's perspective be integrated in health technology assessment conducted for taking decisions on access to care and treatment?支付方的观点:多发性硬化症的负担是什么,以及在进行卫生技术评估以决定获得护理和治疗的机会时,应如何将患者的观点纳入其中?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):60-70. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650743.
4
The clinical perspective: How to personalise treatment in MS and how may biomarkers including imaging contribute to this?临床视角:如何实现多发性硬化症的个性化治疗,以及包括影像学在内的生物标志物对此能有何帮助?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):18-33. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650739.
5
The importance of a multi-disciplinary perspective and patient activation programmes in MS management.多学科视角和患者激活计划在多发性硬化症管理中的重要性。
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):34-46. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650741.
6
The patient's perspective: How to create awareness for improving access to care and treatment of MS patients?患者视角:如何提高对改善多发性硬化症患者获得护理和治疗机会的认识?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):9-17. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650742.
7
Preface.前言。
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):2-3. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650745.
8
The regulator's perspective: How should new therapies and follow-on products for MS be clinically evaluated in the future?监管机构的观点:未来多发性硬化症的新疗法和后续产品应如何进行临床评估?
Mult Scler. 2016 Aug;22(2 Suppl):47-59. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650744.
9
Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.多发性硬化症未满足的需求、治疗负担和患者参与:21 世纪多发性硬化症指导小组的综合观点。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;19:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.