Venetis Maria K, MacGeorge Erina L, Baptiste Dadrie F, Mouton Ashton, Friley Lorin B, Pastor Rebekah, Hatten Kristen, Lagoo Janaka, Bowling Monet W, Clare Susan E
Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;41(6):519-525. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000321.
The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted.
Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision.
Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited.
Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.
在过去十年中,对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的比例急剧上升。本研究旨在探讨社交网络、外科医生和媒体对患者CPM决策的影响,不仅要研究谁影响了决策、影响程度如何,还要研究施加的影响类型。
2008年至2012年期间在印第安纳大学附属的4家医院接受CPM的患者(N = 113)于2013年完成了结构化电话访谈。问题涉及社交网络(家人、朋友和非外科医疗专业人员)、外科医生和媒体对CPM决策的参与和影响。
据报告,配偶、子女、家人、朋友和医疗专业人员对患者的决策产生了一定程度的影响,很大程度上是以对CPM积极或中立的方式。大多数外科医生被视为提供选择,而不是鼓励或劝阻CPM。存在媒体影响,但有限。
选择CPM的患者是在其社交网络成员的影响和支持下做出这一决定的。扭转CPM选择增加的趋势需要对这些有影响力的人进行教育,这可以通过鼓励患者让他们参与临床咨询,以及为患者提供可与社交网络分享的教育材料来实现。外科医生需要被视为有自己的观点,特别是CPM应仅适用于那些有医学指征的患者。