Kadono Yoshifumi, Nohara Takahiro, Kadomoto Suguru, Nakashima Kazufumi, Iijima Masashi, Shigehara Kazuyoshi, Narimoto Kazutaka, Izumi Kouji, Mizokami Atsushi
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2016 Aug;36(8):4293-8.
The aims of the study were to investigate desirable evaluation methods for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) by analyzing the urinary status before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Questionnaires were evaluated from 155 patients prior to operation. The 24-h pad test before RARP revealed a weight of 1.1 g. The mean scores were as follows: total International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, 1.2; total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), 10.0; IPSS quality of life, 2.7; Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), 2.9; and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary summary, 92.8. The abdominal leak point pressure test in 111 patients before RARP was negative in all cases. Desirable evaluation methods for PPI should be based on a combination of subjective and objective evaluations and comparisons between pre- and post-RP. ICIQ-SF is considerably convenient for evaluating incontinence, and the 24-h pad test enables evaluation of the incontinence volume in a highly objective manner.
本研究的目的是通过分析机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)前的排尿状况,探讨前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)的理想评估方法。对155例患者术前的问卷进行了评估。RARP前的24小时尿垫试验显示重量为1.1克。平均得分如下:国际尿失禁咨询委员会简表(ICIQ-SF)总分1.2分;国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)总分10.0分;IPSS生活质量评分2.7分;膀胱过度活动症症状评分(OABSS)2.9分;扩展前列腺癌指数综合排尿总结评分92.8分。111例患者RARP前的腹压漏尿点压力试验结果均为阴性。PPI的理想评估方法应基于主观和客观评估以及RP前后的比较。ICIQ-SF在评估尿失禁方面非常方便,24小时尿垫试验能够以高度客观的方式评估尿失禁量。