• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量围手术期结果。

Measuring perioperative outcome.

作者信息

Shulman Mark, Myles Paul

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;29(6):733-738. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000383.

DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000383
PMID:27466976
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measuring clinically relevant and patient-centered perioperative outcomes provides the knowledge that enables clinicians to optimize their practice and guide shared decision-making, researchers to set a future agenda and policymakers to prioritize healthcare spending.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large international collaboration is currently working to define a set of core outcomes for use in perioperative medicine research. Standardizing which outcomes are measured and how they are defined will help ensure that perioperative research output is meaningful and practice changing. The ability to pool nonheterogeneous data from multiple clinical trials will also improve ability of research to provide definitive answers and improve the cost-effectiveness of research spending.

SUMMARY

Future clinical trials in perioperative medicine should utilize clearly defined, validated and standardized patient-centered outcome measures.

摘要

综述目的

衡量具有临床相关性且以患者为中心的围手术期结局,可为临床医生优化其医疗实践及指导共同决策提供知识依据,为研究人员设定未来议程,也为政策制定者确定医疗保健支出的优先事项提供参考。

最新发现

目前一项大型国际合作正在致力于确定一套用于围手术期医学研究的核心结局指标。对所测量的结局指标及其定义进行标准化,将有助于确保围手术期研究成果具有实际意义并能改变医疗实践。整合来自多个临床试验的非同质化数据的能力,也将提高研究提供明确答案的能力,并提高研究经费的成本效益。

总结

未来围手术期医学的临床试验应采用明确界定、经过验证且标准化的以患者为中心的结局指标。

相似文献

1
Measuring perioperative outcome.测量围手术期结果。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;29(6):733-738. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000383.
2
Standardizing endpoints in perioperative research.规范围手术期研究中的终点指标。
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;63(2):159-68. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0565-y. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: towards a core and extended outcome set.规范围手术期试验的终点:迈向核心结局集和扩展结局集
Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):586-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew066.
4
The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.ISPOR 成本效益研究质量改进良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
5
Standardized Renal Endpoints for Perioperative Clinical Trials: The Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine Initiative.围手术期临床试验的标准化肾脏终点:围手术期医学倡议中的标准化终点
Nephron. 2017;137(4):302-305. doi: 10.1159/000478055. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
7
Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials.围手术期临床试验中恢复质量的测量
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):396-401. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612.
8
Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making.骨关节炎共同决策测量核心领域草案的制定:骨关节炎国际倡议组织(OMERACT)共同决策工作组
J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;42(12):2442-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141205. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Defining a Minimum Set of Standardized Patient-centered Outcome Measures for Macular Degeneration.定义一套最小化的标准化以患者为中心的黄斑变性结局指标。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Outcome measures for palliative care research.姑息治疗研究的结果测量指标。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012 Dec;6(4):500-7. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32835a66ca.

引用本文的文献

1
Metrics to assess the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management in Canada: a scoping review.评估加拿大麻醉、围手术期护理及急性疼痛管理质量的指标:一项范围综述
Can J Anaesth. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02943-1.
2
Effects of S-ketamine on recovery quality in elderly patients with impaired intrinsic capacity after total knee arthroplasty: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study protocol.S-氯胺酮对全膝关节置换术后内在能力受损老年患者恢复质量的影响:一项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e094060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094060.
3
A survey and analysis of peri-operative quality indicators promoted by National Societies of Anaesthesiologists in Europe: The EQUIP project.
一项针对欧洲麻醉医师国家学会推广的围手术期质量指标的调查和分析:EQUIP 项目。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Nov 1;41(11):800-812. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002054. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study.术后恢复质量评分的心理测量评估-初步验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0289685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289685. eCollection 2023.
5
An evaluation of the outcome metric 'days alive and at home' in older patients after hip fracture surgery.评估老年髋部骨折手术后患者的生存和在家天数这一结局指标。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Aug;77(8):901-909. doi: 10.1111/anae.15742. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
6
Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension.对具有临床显著门静脉高压症的肝细胞癌患者进行肝切除术。
JHEP Rep. 2020 Oct 8;3(1):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100190. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Root causes and outcomes of postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study.腹部手术后肺部并发症的根本原因及后果:一项回顾性观察队列研究
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Dec 3;13:40. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0221-5. eCollection 2019.
8
Risk Assessment.风险评估
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2018;8(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40140-018-0246-9. Epub 2018 Jan 30.