Mendoza M E, Capafons A, Gralow J R, Syrjala K L, Suárez-Rodríguez J M, Fann J R, Jensen M P
Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Personalitat, Avaluació i Tractaments Psicològics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1832-1838. doi: 10.1002/pon.4232. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
This study evaluated the efficacy of an intervention combining the Valencia model of waking hypnosis with cognitive-behavioral therapy (VMWH-CBT) in managing cancer-related pain, fatigue, and sleep problems in individuals with active cancer or who were post-treatment survivors. We hypothesized that four sessions of VMWH-CBT would result in greater improvement in participants' symptoms than four sessions of an education control intervention. Additionally, we examined the effects on several secondary outcome domains that are associated with increases in these symptoms (depression, pain interference, pain catastrophizing, and cancer treatment distress).
The study design was a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial comparing the VMWH-CBT intervention with education control. Participants (N = 44) received four sessions of both treatments, in a counterbalanced order (n = 22 per order condition).
Participants were 89% female (N = 39) with mean age of 61 years (SD = 12.2). They reported significantly greater improvement after receiving the active treatment relative to the control condition in all the outcome measures. Treatment gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up.
This study supports the beneficial effects of the VMWH-CBT intervention relative to a control condition and that treatment gains remain stable. VMWH-CBT-trained clinicians should be accessible for managing symptoms both during and after cancer treatment, though the findings need to be replicated in larger samples of cancer survivors.
本研究评估了将瓦伦西亚清醒催眠模型与认知行为疗法相结合的干预措施(VMWH-CBT)在管理患有活动性癌症的个体或癌症治疗后幸存者的癌症相关疼痛、疲劳和睡眠问题方面的疗效。我们假设,与四次教育对照干预相比,四次VMWH-CBT干预将使参与者的症状得到更大改善。此外,我们还研究了对与这些症状增加相关的几个次要结果领域(抑郁、疼痛干扰、疼痛灾难化和癌症治疗困扰)的影响。
研究设计为一项随机对照交叉临床试验,比较VMWH-CBT干预与教育对照。参与者(N = 44)以平衡顺序接受两种治疗各四次(每种顺序条件下n = 22)。
参与者中89%为女性(N = 39),平均年龄61岁(标准差 = 12.2)。他们报告称,在所有结果测量中,接受积极治疗后相对于对照条件有显著更大的改善。治疗效果在3个月随访时得以维持。
本研究支持VMWH-CBT干预相对于对照条件的有益效果,且治疗效果保持稳定。尽管研究结果需要在更大样本的癌症幸存者中重复验证,但经过VMWH-CBT培训的临床医生应能够在癌症治疗期间和之后管理症状。