Dept of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2016 Sep;48(3):843-51. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01966-2015. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
This post hoc analysis examined the differences in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis disease progression and the effects of pirfenidone in patients stratified by more preserved versus less preserved baseline lung function status using forced vital capacity (FVC) or GAP (gender, age and physiology) index stage.Efficacy outcomes, i.e. FVC, 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and dyspnoea (University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ)), were analysed at 12 months in patients randomised to pirfenidone 2403 mg·day(-1) or placebo in the pooled phase 3 CAPACITY/ASCEND population (n=1247), with subgroups stratified by baseline FVC ≥80% versus <80% or GAP stage I versus II-III. Treatment-by-subgroup interaction was tested based on a rank ANCOVA model; factors in the model included study, region, treatment, subgroup and treatment-by-subgroup interaction term.Patients with both more preserved (FVC ≥80% or GAP stage I) and less preserved (FVC <80% or GAP stage II-III) lung function at baseline demonstrated clinically significant disease progression at 12 months in terms of categorical decline in FVC, 6MWD and UCSD SOBQ. The magnitude of pirfenidone treatment effect was comparable between subgroups, regardless of whether lung function was classified using FVC or GAP index stage.These findings support the initiation of treatment with pirfenidone, irrespective of stage of baseline lung function in this patient population.
本事后分析使用用力肺活量(FVC)或 GAP(性别、年龄和生理学)指数阶段,根据基线肺功能状态保留程度较高与较低,分层比较特发性肺纤维化疾病进展和吡非尼酮治疗效果的差异。在 CAPACITY/ASCEND 研究的汇总阶段,将随机分配至吡非尼酮 2403mg·天-1 或安慰剂的患者(n=1247),在 12 个月时分析疗效结局,如 FVC、6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)和呼吸困难(加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥短气问卷(UCSD SOBQ)),并根据基线 FVC≥80%与<80%或 GAP Ⅰ期与Ⅱ-Ⅲ期进行亚组分层。根据等级协方差分析模型检验治疗与亚组的交互作用;模型中的因素包括研究、地区、治疗、亚组和治疗与亚组的交互作用项。在基线时肺功能保留程度较高(FVC≥80%或 GAP Ⅰ期)和较低(FVC<80%或 GAP Ⅱ-Ⅲ期)的患者,在 12 个月时 FVC、6MWD 和 UCSD SOBQ 均出现有临床意义的分类下降,表明疾病进展。无论使用 FVC 还是 GAP 指数阶段来分类肺功能,吡非尼酮治疗效果的幅度在亚组间均相似。这些发现支持在该患者人群中,无论基线肺功能处于何种阶段,都启动吡非尼酮治疗。