Sakai Kenichiro, Yoshii Toshitaka, Hirai Takashi, Arai Yoshiyasu, Shinomiya Kenichi, Okawa Atsushi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Nishikawaguchi 5-11-5, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-8558, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunky-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):104-112. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4717-8. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
Cervical sagittal balance has received increased attention as an important determinant of radiological and clinical outcomes. However, no prospective studies have compared the impact of cervical sagittal balance between anterior and posterior surgeries. We previously conducted a prospective study comparing anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and reported; however, analysis of cervical alignment within the concept of sagittal balance has yet to be performed, because that concept has recently been proposed. This study aimed to review this prospective cohort, specifically focusing on cervical sagittal balance.
We prospectively performed ADF or LAMP for DCM patients based on the year of enrollment: ADF was performed in odd-numbered years and LAMP in even-numbered years. Cervical lateral X-ray images taken in the neutral standing position were evaluated preoperatively and at a 1-year follow-up. The radiographic measurements included the following: (1) CL (cervical lordosis: C2-7 lordotic angle), (2) CGH (center of gravity of the head)-C7 SVA (sagittal vertical axis), and (3) C7 slope. The clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score).
We analyzed the data for 66 patients (ADF n = 28, LAMP n = 38). While the CL and CGH-C7 SVA in the ADF were unchanged after the operation, those in the LAMP group worsened, especially in patients with preoperative cervical sagittal imbalance. The C7 slopes were not affected by the operation in either group. The postoperative decreases in the CL in the LAMP group correlated with the preoperative CGH-C7 SVA (r = 0.618, P < 0.01), but those in ADF group did not. In patients with preoperative cervical sagittal imbalance (CGH-C7 SVA ≥40 mm), the recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the ADF group was superior to that in the LAMP group (67.3 vs. 39.8 %). In contrast, for patients without cervical sagittal imbalance, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score showed no significant difference between the ADF and LAMP groups (64.5 vs. 58.7 %).
Postoperative cervical sagittal alignment and balance were maintained after ADF but deteriorated following LAMP, especially in patients with preoperative CGH-C7 SVA ≥40 mm. In these patients, neurological recovery after LAMP was unsatisfactory. LAMP is not suitable for degenerative cervical myelopathy patients with preoperative cervical sagittal imbalance.
颈椎矢状面平衡作为放射学和临床结果的重要决定因素,已受到越来越多的关注。然而,尚无前瞻性研究比较前后路手术对颈椎矢状面平衡的影响。我们之前进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较前路减压融合术(ADF)和椎板成形术(LAMP)治疗退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM),并进行了报道;然而,由于矢状面平衡这一概念最近才被提出,因此尚未在矢状面平衡概念范围内对颈椎对线进行分析。本研究旨在回顾这一前瞻性队列,特别关注颈椎矢状面平衡。
我们根据入组年份对DCM患者前瞻性地实施ADF或LAMP:奇数年份实施ADF,偶数年份实施LAMP。在中立位站立时拍摄的颈椎侧位X线片于术前及术后1年进行评估。影像学测量包括以下内容:(1)颈椎前凸(CL:C2 - 7前凸角),(2)头重心(CGH)-C7矢状垂直轴(SVA),以及(3)C7斜率。临床结果采用日本骨科协会颈椎脊髓病评分系统(C-JOA评分)进行评估。
我们分析了66例患者的数据(ADF组28例,LAMP组38例)。ADF术后CL和CGH - C7 SVA未发生改变,而LAMP组的这些指标恶化,尤其是术前颈椎矢状面失衡的患者。两组患者的C7斜率均未受手术影响。LAMP组术后CL的降低与术前CGH - C7 SVA相关(r = 0.618,P < 0.01),而ADF组则无此相关性。术前颈椎矢状面失衡(CGH - C7 SVA≥40 mm)的患者中,ADF组C-JOA评分的恢复率优于LAMP组(67.3%对39.8%)。相反,对于无颈椎矢状面失衡的患者,ADF组和LAMP组C-JOA评分的恢复率无显著差异(64.5%对58.7%)。
ADF术后颈椎矢状面对线和平衡得以维持,但LAMP术后则恶化,尤其是术前CGH - C7 SVA≥40 mm的患者。在这些患者中,LAMP术后神经功能恢复不理想。LAMP不适用于术前存在颈椎矢状面失衡的退行性颈椎脊髓病患者。