Suppr超能文献

颈椎前路减压融合术与选择性椎板成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的手术效果比较研究。

A comparative study of surgical outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2022 Nov;27(6):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.08.012. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have directly compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with short-segment disease. We aimed to examine and compare surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and selective laminoplasty (S-LAMP) in CSM patients with 1- or 2-level disease.

METHODS

Forty-six patients, who received surgeries for CSM, were prospectively investigated; 24 underwent ACDF and 22 underwent S-LAMP. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were recorded: (1) C2-7 angle, (2) local angle (lordotic Cobb angle at operative level), (3) cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (center of gravity of the head-C7 SVA), and (4) C7 slope. Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), neck pain visual analog scale, and neck disability index (NDI).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Postoperatively, C2-7 angle, local angle, cervical SVA, C7 slope, C-JOA score, and neck pain and NDI scores were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was superior in the ACDF group (57.5%) compared to the S-LAMP group (42.1%). The recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the local lordosis subgroup (local angle ≥ 0°) showed no significant difference between the two surgical groups. However, in the local kyphosis subgroup (local angle < 0°), C-JOA score recovery rate was worse after S-LAMP (20.4%) than ACDF (57.9%); local angle also worsened postoperatively after S-LAMP.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with local lordosis at the segments of cervical spondylosis and spinal cord compression, S-LAMP showed equivalent surgical outcomes (neurological recovery, neck pain and NDI scores, and cervical alignment) to ACDF. However, in patients with local kyphosis, S-LAMP worsened the kyphosis and resulted in worse neurological recovery.

摘要

背景

鲜有研究直接比较过颈椎脊髓病(CSM)伴短节段病变患者前路和后路手术的效果。本研究旨在比较颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)和选择性单开门椎管扩大成形术(S-LAMP)治疗 1-2 个节段病变的CSM 患者的手术效果。

方法

前瞻性研究 46 例行手术治疗的 CSM 患者,其中 24 例行 ACDF,22 例行 S-LAMP。平均随访 3.5 年。记录术前和术后以下影像学测量指标:(1)C2-7 角,(2)局部角(手术节段的前凸 Cobb 角),(3)颈椎矢状轴垂直距离(C7 重心-颈椎矢状轴垂直距离),和(4)C7 斜率。采用日本骨科协会颈椎评分(C-JOA 评分)、颈痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈残障指数(NDI)评估疗效。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异。术后,两组间 C2-7 角、局部角、颈椎矢状轴垂直距离、C7 斜率、C-JOA 评分、颈痛和 NDI 评分均无显著差异;但 ACDF 组的 C-JOA 评分恢复率(57.5%)优于 S-LAMP 组(42.1%)。局部前凸亚组(局部角≥0°)的 C-JOA 评分恢复率在两组间无显著差异。但在局部后凸亚组(局部角<0°),S-LAMP 组的 C-JOA 评分恢复率(20.4%)差于 ACDF 组(57.9%);且 S-LAMP 术后局部角恶化。

结论

在颈椎病变伴脊髓受压节段存在局部前凸的患者中,S-LAMP 与 ACDF 的手术效果(神经恢复、颈痛和 NDI 评分以及颈椎排列)相当。然而,在存在局部后凸的患者中,S-LAMP 会加重后凸畸形,导致神经恢复更差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验