Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2022 Nov;27(6):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.08.012. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
Few studies have directly compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with short-segment disease. We aimed to examine and compare surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and selective laminoplasty (S-LAMP) in CSM patients with 1- or 2-level disease.
Forty-six patients, who received surgeries for CSM, were prospectively investigated; 24 underwent ACDF and 22 underwent S-LAMP. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were recorded: (1) C2-7 angle, (2) local angle (lordotic Cobb angle at operative level), (3) cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (center of gravity of the head-C7 SVA), and (4) C7 slope. Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), neck pain visual analog scale, and neck disability index (NDI).
There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Postoperatively, C2-7 angle, local angle, cervical SVA, C7 slope, C-JOA score, and neck pain and NDI scores were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was superior in the ACDF group (57.5%) compared to the S-LAMP group (42.1%). The recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the local lordosis subgroup (local angle ≥ 0°) showed no significant difference between the two surgical groups. However, in the local kyphosis subgroup (local angle < 0°), C-JOA score recovery rate was worse after S-LAMP (20.4%) than ACDF (57.9%); local angle also worsened postoperatively after S-LAMP.
In patients with local lordosis at the segments of cervical spondylosis and spinal cord compression, S-LAMP showed equivalent surgical outcomes (neurological recovery, neck pain and NDI scores, and cervical alignment) to ACDF. However, in patients with local kyphosis, S-LAMP worsened the kyphosis and resulted in worse neurological recovery.
鲜有研究直接比较过颈椎脊髓病(CSM)伴短节段病变患者前路和后路手术的效果。本研究旨在比较颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)和选择性单开门椎管扩大成形术(S-LAMP)治疗 1-2 个节段病变的CSM 患者的手术效果。
前瞻性研究 46 例行手术治疗的 CSM 患者,其中 24 例行 ACDF,22 例行 S-LAMP。平均随访 3.5 年。记录术前和术后以下影像学测量指标:(1)C2-7 角,(2)局部角(手术节段的前凸 Cobb 角),(3)颈椎矢状轴垂直距离(C7 重心-颈椎矢状轴垂直距离),和(4)C7 斜率。采用日本骨科协会颈椎评分(C-JOA 评分)、颈痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈残障指数(NDI)评估疗效。
两组患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异。术后,两组间 C2-7 角、局部角、颈椎矢状轴垂直距离、C7 斜率、C-JOA 评分、颈痛和 NDI 评分均无显著差异;但 ACDF 组的 C-JOA 评分恢复率(57.5%)优于 S-LAMP 组(42.1%)。局部前凸亚组(局部角≥0°)的 C-JOA 评分恢复率在两组间无显著差异。但在局部后凸亚组(局部角<0°),S-LAMP 组的 C-JOA 评分恢复率(20.4%)差于 ACDF 组(57.9%);且 S-LAMP 术后局部角恶化。
在颈椎病变伴脊髓受压节段存在局部前凸的患者中,S-LAMP 与 ACDF 的手术效果(神经恢复、颈痛和 NDI 评分以及颈椎排列)相当。然而,在存在局部后凸的患者中,S-LAMP 会加重后凸畸形,导致神经恢复更差。