Wu Amy R, Kuo Arthur D
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2016 Oct 1;219(Pt 19):3106-3113. doi: 10.1242/jeb.137356. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
During each step of human walking, the swing foot passes close to the ground with a small but (usually) non-zero clearance. The foot can occasionally scuff against the ground, with some risk of stumbling or tripping. The risk might be mitigated simply by lifting the foot higher, but presumably at increased effort, of unknown amount. Perhaps the normally preferred ground clearance is a trade-off between competing costs, one for lifting the foot higher and one for scuffing it. We tested this by measuring the metabolic energy cost of lifting and scuffing the foot, treating these apparently dissimilar behaviors as part of a single continuum, where scuffing is a form of negative foot lift. We measured young, healthy adults (N=9) lifting or scuffing the foot by various amounts mid-swing during treadmill walking, and observed substantial costs, each well capable of doubling the net metabolic rate for normal walking (gross cost minus that for standing). In relative terms, the cost for scuffing increased over twice as steeply as that for lifting. That relative difference means that the expected value of cost, which takes into account movement variability, occurs at a non-zero mean clearance, approximately matching the preferred clearance we observed. Energy cost alone is only a lower bound on the overall disadvantages of inadvertent ground contact, but it is sufficient to show how human behavior may be determined not only by the separate costs of different trade-offs but also by movement variability, which can influence the average cost actually experienced in practice.
在人类行走的每一步中,摆动脚都以较小但(通常)非零的间隙靠近地面。脚偶尔会擦到地面,存在绊倒或摔倒的风险。可以通过将脚抬得更高来降低这种风险,但这样做可能会增加用力程度,而增加的程度未知。也许通常偏好的离地间隙是在相互竞争的成本之间进行权衡的结果,一种成本是将脚抬得更高,另一种成本是脚擦地。我们通过测量抬脚和擦地的代谢能量消耗来测试这一点,将这些明显不同的行为视为一个单一连续体的一部分,其中擦地是负向抬脚的一种形式。我们测量了9名年轻健康的成年人在跑步机行走过程中摆动中期以不同幅度抬脚或擦地的情况,并观察到了可观的能量消耗,每一种情况都足以使正常行走的净代谢率翻倍(总消耗减去站立时的消耗)。相对而言,擦地的能量消耗增长速度比抬脚的能量消耗增长速度陡两倍多。这种相对差异意味着,考虑到运动变异性的成本期望值出现在非零的平均间隙处,大致与我们观察到的偏好间隙相匹配。仅能量消耗只是意外地面接触总体不利因素的下限,但它足以表明人类行为不仅可能由不同权衡的单独成本决定,还可能由运动变异性决定,运动变异性会影响实际经历的平均成本。