Halloway Shannon, Wilbur JoEllen, Schoeny Michael E, Arfanakis Konstantinos
1 Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.
2 Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Biol Res Nurs. 2017 Jan;19(1):53-64. doi: 10.1177/1099800416660758. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
Physical activity intervention studies that focus on improving cognitive function in older adults have increasingly used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures in addition to neurocognitive measures to assess effects on the brain. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the effects of endurance-focused physical activity randomized controlled trial (RCT) interventions on the brain as measured by MRI in community-dwelling middle-aged or older adults without cognitive impairment. Five electronic databases were searched. The final sample included six studies. None of the studies reported racial or ethnic characteristics of the participants. All studies included neurocognitive measures in addition to MRI. Five of the six interventions included laboratory-based treadmill or supervised bike exercise sessions, while one included community-based physical activity. Physical activity measures were limited to assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness and, in one study, pedometer. Due to the lack of adequate data reported, effect sizes were calculated for only one study for MRI measures and two studies for neurocognitive measures. Effect sizes ranged from d = .2 to .3 for MRI measures and .2 to .32 for neurocognitive measures. Findings of the individual studies suggest that MRI measures may be more sensitive to the effects of physical activity than neurocognitive measures. Future studies are needed that include diverse, community-based participants, direct measures of physical activity, and complete reporting of MRI and neurocognitive findings.
专注于改善老年人认知功能的体育活动干预研究,除了使用神经认知测量方法外,越来越多地采用磁共振成像(MRI)测量方法来评估对大脑的影响。本系统评价的目的是确定以耐力为主的体育活动随机对照试验(RCT)干预措施对社区居住的无认知障碍的中年或老年人大脑的影响,该影响通过MRI测量。检索了五个电子数据库。最终样本包括六项研究。没有一项研究报告参与者的种族或民族特征。所有研究除了MRI外还包括神经认知测量。六项干预措施中的五项包括基于实验室的跑步机或有监督的自行车锻炼课程,而一项包括基于社区的体育活动。体育活动测量仅限于心肺适能评估,在一项研究中还包括计步器。由于报告的数据不足,仅对一项MRI测量研究和两项神经认知测量研究计算了效应量。MRI测量的效应量范围为d = 0.2至0.3,神经认知测量的效应量范围为0.2至0.32。个别研究的结果表明,MRI测量可能比神经认知测量对体育活动的影响更敏感。未来需要开展包括多样化的、基于社区的参与者、体育活动的直接测量以及MRI和神经认知结果完整报告的研究。