Suppr超能文献

赫尔曼·科恩的《无穷小方法原理》:一本不成功著作的历史。

Hermann Cohen's Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode: The history of an unsuccessful book.

作者信息

Giovanelli Marco

机构信息

Universität Tübingen, Forum Scientiarum, Doblerstraße 33 72074 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Aug;58:9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

Abstract

This paper offers an introduction to Hermann Cohen's Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode (1883), and recounts the history of its controversial reception by Cohen's early sympathizers, who would become the so-called 'Marburg school' of Neo-Kantianism, as well as the reactions it provoked outside this group. By dissecting the ambiguous attitudes of the best-known representatives of the school (Paul Natorp and Ernst Cassirer), as well as those of several minor figures (August Stadler, Kurd Lasswitz, Dimitry Gawronsky, etc.), this paper shows that Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode is a unicum in the history of philosophy: it represents a strange case of an unsuccessful book's enduring influence. The "puzzle of Cohen's Infinitesimalmethode," as we will call it, can be solved by looking beyond the scholarly results of the book, and instead focusing on the style of philosophy it exemplified. Moreover, the paper shows that Cohen never supported, but instead explicitly opposed, the doctrine of the centrality of the 'concept of function', with which Marburg Neo-Kantianism is usually associated.

摘要

本文介绍了赫尔曼·柯亨的《无穷小方法原理》(1883年),并叙述了柯亨早期的支持者对该书有争议的接受史,这些支持者后来成为新康德主义所谓的“马尔堡学派”,同时也讲述了该书在这个群体之外所引发的反响。通过剖析该学派最著名的代表人物(保罗·纳托普和恩斯特·卡西尔)以及几位次要人物(奥古斯特·施塔德勒、库尔德·拉斯维茨、迪米特里·加夫龙斯基等)的模糊态度,本文表明《无穷小方法原理》在哲学史上是独一无二的:它代表了一本不成功的著作却产生持久影响的奇特案例。我们所谓的“柯亨的无穷小方法之谜”,可以通过超越该书的学术成果,转而关注它所例证的哲学风格来解决。此外,本文表明柯亨从未支持,而是明确反对通常与马尔堡新康德主义相关联的“函数概念中心论”学说。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验