Segal Ahuva Y, Sletten Tracey L, Flynn-Evans Erin E, Lockley Steven W, Rajaratnam Shantha M W
Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Sleep and Circadian Medicine Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Biol Rhythms. 2016 Oct;31(5):470-82. doi: 10.1177/0748730416659953. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
While previous studies have demonstrated short-wavelength sensitivity to the acute alerting effects of light during the biological night, fewer studies have assessed the alerting effect of light during the daytime. This study assessed the wavelength-dependent sensitivity of the acute alerting effects of daytime light exposure following chronic sleep restriction in 60 young adults (29 men, 31 women; 22.5 ± 3.1 mean ± SD years). Participants were restricted to 5 h time in bed the night before laboratory admission and 3 h time in bed in the laboratory, aligned by wake time. Participants were randomized for exposure to 3 h total of either narrowband blue (λmax 458-480 nm, n = 23) or green light (λmax 551-555 nm, n = 25) of equal photon densities (2.8-8.4 × 10(13) photons/cm(2)/sec), beginning 3.25 h after waking, and compared with a darkness control (0 lux, n = 12). Subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale), sustained attention (auditory Psychomotor Vigilance Task), mood (Profile of Mood States Bi-Polar form), working memory (2-back task), selective attention (Stroop task), and polysomnographic and ocular sleepiness measures (Optalert) were assessed prior to, during, and after light exposure. We found no significant effect of light wavelength on these measures, with the exception of a single mood subscale. Further research is needed to optimize the characteristics of lighting systems to induce alerting effects during the daytime, taking into account potential interactions between homeostatic sleep pressure, circadian phase, and light responsiveness.
虽然先前的研究已经证明,在生物夜间期间,短波长光对急性警觉效应具有敏感性,但评估白天光照警觉效应的研究较少。本研究评估了60名年轻成年人(29名男性,31名女性;平均年龄22.5±3.1岁,标准差)在长期睡眠限制后白天光照暴露的急性警觉效应的波长依赖性敏感性。参与者在进入实验室前一晚卧床时间限制为5小时,在实验室卧床时间限制为3小时,并根据起床时间进行调整。参与者被随机分配,在醒来3.25小时后开始,暴露于总时长为3小时的窄带蓝光(λmax 458 - 480 nm,n = 23)或绿光(λmax 551 - 555 nm,n = 25)下,两种光的光子密度相等(2.8 - 8.4×10(13) 光子/cm(2)/秒),并与黑暗对照组(0勒克斯,n = 12)进行比较。在光照暴露前、期间和之后,评估主观嗜睡程度(卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表)、持续注意力(听觉心理运动警觉任务)、情绪(情绪状态剖面图双极形式)、工作记忆(2 - 回溯任务)、选择性注意力(斯特鲁普任务)以及多导睡眠图和眼部嗜睡测量指标(Optalert)。我们发现,除了一个情绪子量表外,光波长对这些指标没有显著影响。需要进一步研究以优化照明系统的特性,从而在白天诱发警觉效应,同时考虑到稳态睡眠压力、昼夜节律相位和光反应性之间的潜在相互作用。