Houser Kevin W, Esposito Tony
School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Advanced Lighting Team, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Portland, OR, United States.
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 27;12:630553. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.630553. eCollection 2021.
At its best, human-centric lighting considers the visual and non-visual effects of light in support of positive human outcomes. At its worst, it is a marketing phrase used to healthwash lighting products or lighting design solutions. There is no doubt that environmental lighting contributes to human health, but how might one practice human-centric lighting given both the credible potential and the implausible hype? Marketing literature is filled with promises. Technical lighting societies have summarized the science but have not yet offered design guidance. Meanwhile, designers are in the middle, attempting to distinguish credible knowledge from that which is dubious to make design decisions that affect people directly. This article is intended to: (1) empower the reader with fundamental understandings of ways in which light affects health; (2) provide a process for human-centric lighting design that can dovetail with the decision-making process that is already a part of a designer's workflow.
以人为本的照明若发挥到极致，会考虑光的视觉和非视觉效果，以支持积极的人类成果。而若发挥得最差，它就只是一个用于美化照明产品或照明设计解决方案的营销用语。毫无疑问，环境照明有助于人类健康，但鉴于其既有可信的潜力又有不实的炒作，人们该如何践行以人为本的照明呢？营销文献充斥着各种承诺。技术照明协会已总结了相关科学知识，但尚未提供设计指导。与此同时，设计师处于中间位置，试图区分可靠知识与可疑知识，以便做出直接影响人们的设计决策。本文旨在：（1）让读者对光影响健康的方式有基本了解；（2）提供一个以人为本的照明设计流程，使其能与设计师工作流程中已有的决策过程相契合。
