Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Bacteriology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Departments of Infectious Diseases and General Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Nov;22(11):946.e9-946.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Empiric therapy of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections with vancomycin is associated with poorer outcome than targeted therapy with β-lactams. Our objective was to evaluate whether rapid determination of methicillin resistance shortens the time from Gram stain to targeted antimicrobial therapy in staphylococcal bacteraemia, thereby reducing vancomycin overuse. This was a single-centre open parallel RCT. Gram-positive cocci in clusters in positive blood culture underwent real-time PCR for rapid species and methicillin resistance determination parallel to conventional microbiology. Patients were randomized 1:1 so that clinicians would be informed of PCR results (intervention group) or not (control group). Eighty-nine patients (intervention 48, control 41) were analysed. MRSA was identified in seven patients, MSSA in 46, and CoNS in 36. PCR results were highly concordant (87/89) with standard microbiology. Median time (hours) from Gram stain to transmission of methicillin-susceptibility was 3.9 (2.8-4.3) vs. 25.4 (24.4-26-7) in intervention vs. control groups (p <0.001). Median time (hours) from Gram stain to targeted treatment was similar for 'all staphylococci' [6 (3.8-10) vs. 8 (1-36) p 0.13] but shorter in the intervention group when considering S. aureus only [5 (3-7) vs. 25.5 (3.8-54) p <0.001]. When standard susceptibility testing was complete, 41/48 (85.4%) patients in the intervention group were already receiving targeted therapy compared with 23/41 (56.1%) in the control group (p 0.004). There was no significant effect on clinical outcomes. Rapid determination of methicillin resistance in staphylococcal bacteraemia is accurate and reduces significantly the time to targeted antibiotic therapy in the subgroup of S. aureus, thereby avoiding unnecessary exposure to vancomycin.
经验性治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MSSA) 感染使用万古霉素的效果不如使用β-内酰胺类药物的靶向治疗。我们的目的是评估快速测定甲氧西林耐药性是否会缩短葡萄球菌菌血症中从革兰氏染色到靶向抗菌治疗的时间,从而减少万古霉素的过度使用。这是一项单中心开放平行 RCT。阳性血培养中呈簇状的革兰氏阳性球菌同时进行实时 PCR 以快速鉴定种属和甲氧西林耐药性,与传统微生物学平行进行。患者以 1:1 随机分组,使临床医生能够获得 PCR 结果(干预组)或不获得(对照组)。共分析了 89 例患者(干预组 48 例,对照组 41 例)。共检出 7 例耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、46 例甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌和 36 例凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。PCR 结果与标准微生物学高度一致(87/89)。从革兰氏染色到传输甲氧西林敏感性的中位时间(小时)在干预组和对照组分别为 3.9(2.8-4.3)和 25.4(24.4-26-7)(p <0.001)。从革兰氏染色到靶向治疗的中位时间(小时)对于“所有葡萄球菌”相似[6(3.8-10)vs. 8(1-36)p 0.13],但仅考虑金黄色葡萄球菌时,干预组较短[5(3-7)vs. 25.5(3.8-54)p <0.001]。当标准药敏试验完成时,干预组 48 例患者中有 41 例(85.4%)已经接受靶向治疗,而对照组 41 例患者中有 23 例(56.1%)(p 0.004)。这对临床结果没有显著影响。快速测定葡萄球菌菌血症中的甲氧西林耐药性准确,并且显著缩短了金黄色葡萄球菌亚组中靶向抗生素治疗的时间,从而避免了不必要的万古霉素暴露。