Suppr超能文献

替罗非班冠状动脉内注射联合血栓切除术治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy Combined with Intracoronary Administration of Tirofiban in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

作者信息

Gao Lu, Cao Zhenhua, Zhang Hong

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2016 Jul 31;22:2699-705. doi: 10.12659/msm.896703.

Abstract

BACKGROUND No/slow reflow gives rise to serious complications in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, and can lead to worse outcomes. Several measures are used to prevent no/slow reflow, including thrombus removal processes and intensive use of anticoagulant agents. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombectomy and intracoronary administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly assigned 240 STEMI patients into 3 groups. Before PPCI, patients in group A received thrombectomy and intracoronary administration of tirofiban. Patients in group B received thrombectomy, and patients in group C neither of these 2 treatments. Their demographic data and coronary angiography results were recorded. TIMI grade flow was used to evaluate the effect. After the follow-up, major adverse cardiac events were regarded as study endpoints in evaluating the safety of the combined therapy. RESULTS We found no significant differences among the 3 groups in demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05). Patients in group A had better TIMI grade classifications and ST-segment elevation (p=0.005), and lower incidence of no/slow reflow (p=0.031) and MACE. During 6-month follow-up, the MACE rate was lower in group A than in groups B and C (p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS The use of thrombectomy combined with intracoronary administration of tirofiban is relatively effective and safe in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.

摘要

背景

无复流/慢血流在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中会引发严重并发症,并可能导致更差的预后。有多种措施用于预防无复流/慢血流,包括血栓清除过程以及强化使用抗凝剂。我们的研究旨在评估血栓切除术及冠状动脉内注射糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂在接受直接PCI的STEMI患者中的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

我们将240例STEMI患者随机分为3组。在直接PCI前,A组患者接受血栓切除术及冠状动脉内注射替罗非班;B组患者接受血栓切除术;C组患者不接受这两种治疗中的任何一种。记录他们的人口统计学数据及冠状动脉造影结果。采用心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血流分级来评估疗效。随访后,将主要不良心脏事件作为评估联合治疗安全性的研究终点。

结果

我们发现3组患者在人口统计学和临床特征方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。A组患者的TIMI分级及ST段抬高情况更佳(p=0.005),无复流/慢血流发生率及主要不良心血管事件发生率更低(p=0.031)。在6个月的随访期间,A组的主要不良心血管事件发生率低于B组和C组(p=0.038)。

结论

在接受直接PCI的STEMI患者中,血栓切除术联合冠状动脉内注射替罗非班的应用相对有效且安全。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.心肌梗死的第三次全球定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 16;60(16):1581-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
Myocardial no-reflow in humans.人类心肌无复流现象
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验