Suppr超能文献

一名患有严重冠状动脉扩张症患者的复发性急性心肌梗死:抗栓治疗的意义

Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Severe Coronary Artery Ectasia: Implication of Antithrombotic Therapy.

作者信息

Tomioka Tomoko, Takeuchi Satoshi, Ito Yoshitaka, Shioiri Hiroki, Koyama Jiro, Inoue Kanichi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, South-Miyagi Medical Center, Shibata, Miyagi, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Case Rep. 2016 Dec 12;17:939-943. doi: 10.12659/ajcr.900474.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be caused not only by plaque rupture/erosion, but also by many other mechanisms. Thromboembolism due to atrial fibrillation and coronary thrombosis due to coronary artery ectasia are among the causes. Here we report on a case of recurrent myocardial infarction with coronary artery ectasia. CASE REPORT Our case was a 78-year-old woman with hypertension. Within a one-month interval, she developed AMI twice at the distal portion of her right coronary artery along with coronary artery ectasia. On both events, emergent coronary angiography showed no obvious organic stenosis or trace of plaque rupture at the culprit segment after thrombus aspiration. After the second acute event, we started anticoagulation therapy with warfarin to prevent thrombus formation. In the chronic phase, we confirmed, by using coronary angiography, optimal coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound, that there was no plaque rupture and no obvious thrombus formation along the coronary artery ectasia segment of the distal right coronary artery, which suggested effectiveness of anticoagulant. Furthermore, by Doppler velocimetry we found sluggish blood flow only in the coronary artery ectasia lesion but not in the left atrium which is generally the main site of systemic thromboembolism revealed by transesophageal echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the two AMI events at the same coronary artery ectasia segment were caused by local thrombus formation due to local stagnant blood flow. Although it has not yet been generally established, anticoagulation therapy may be effective to prevent thrombus formation in patients with coronary artery ectasia regardless of the prevalence of atrial fibrillation.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)不仅可由斑块破裂/侵蚀引起,还可由许多其他机制导致。房颤所致的血栓栓塞以及冠状动脉扩张所致的冠状动脉血栓形成均在其病因之列。在此,我们报告一例冠状动脉扩张伴复发性心肌梗死的病例。

病例报告

我们的病例是一位78岁的高血压女性。在1个月内,她在右冠状动脉远端发生了两次AMI,同时伴有冠状动脉扩张。两次发病时,急诊冠状动脉造影显示,在血栓抽吸后,罪犯节段无明显器质性狭窄或斑块破裂痕迹。第二次急性事件后,我们开始使用华法林进行抗凝治疗以预防血栓形成。在慢性期,我们通过冠状动脉造影、光学相干断层扫描和血管内超声检查确认,右冠状动脉远端冠状动脉扩张节段无斑块破裂且无明显血栓形成,这表明抗凝治疗有效。此外,通过多普勒测速,我们发现仅在冠状动脉扩张病变处血流缓慢,而在经食管超声心动图显示的通常是系统性血栓栓塞主要部位的左心房中血流并不缓慢。

结论

这些结果表明,同一冠状动脉扩张节段的两次AMI事件是由局部血流停滞导致的局部血栓形成所致。尽管尚未普遍确立,但抗凝治疗可能对预防冠状动脉扩张患者的血栓形成有效,无论房颤的发生率如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6131/5156557/959280e3b8b8/amjcaserep-17-939-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验