Suppr超能文献

达托霉素与利奈唑胺治疗万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染的疗效和安全性相似:一项荟萃分析。

Similar efficacy and safety of daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, No. 1 Dahua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing 100730, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, No. 1 Dahua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Sep;48(3):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Abstract

Daptomycin and linezolid are the most commonly used antibiotics for bloodstream infection caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE-BSI). However, the best therapeutic agent to treat VRE-BSI remains to be established. In order to provide evidence for an optimal treatment decision, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing the efficacy and safety of daptomycin and linezolid for the treatment of VRE-BSI. After thorough searching of relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov and international meetings up to November 2015, 11 retrospective cohort studies were finally included with a sample size of 1339 patients. Among these 11 included studies, all patients in the daptomycin group received standard or high-dose daptomycin treatment (≥6 mg/kg/day). Data were extracted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The meta-analysis indicated similar crude overall mortality between patients receiving daptomycin and those treated with linezolid (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.83-1.37). Moreover, no difference regarding clinical cure (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.42), microbiological cure (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09) or relapse rate of VRE-BSI (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.52) was found between daptomycin and linezolid. Adverse event rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Currently available evidence indicates similar efficacy and safety of daptomycin and linezolid for the treatment of VRE-BSI. However, the findings in the meta-analysis are limited by heterogeneity between relatively small-scale retrospective studies and should be interpreted cautiously.

摘要

达托霉素和利奈唑胺是治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)血流感染(BSI)最常用的抗生素。然而,治疗 VRE-BSI 的最佳治疗药物仍有待确定。为了为最佳治疗决策提供证据,我们对达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗 VRE-BSI 的疗效和安全性进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。通过彻底检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Clinicaltrials.gov 和国际会议上截至 2015 年 11 月的相关研究,最终纳入了 11 项回顾性队列研究,共纳入了 1339 例患者。在这 11 项纳入的研究中,达托霉素组所有患者均接受标准或高剂量达托霉素治疗(≥6mg/kg/天)。提取数据并使用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。荟萃分析表明,接受达托霉素治疗的患者与接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者的总死亡率相似(RR=1.07,95%CI 0.83-1.37)。此外,临床治愈率(RR=1.11,95%CI 0.88-1.42)、微生物学治愈率(RR=0.99,95%CI 0.90-1.09)或 VRE-BSI 复发率(RR=1.08,95%CI 0.76-1.52)之间也无差异。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异。目前的证据表明,达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗 VRE-BSI 的疗效和安全性相似。然而,荟萃分析的结果受到相对小规模回顾性研究之间异质性的限制,应谨慎解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验