• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于临床实践的扩展前列腺癌指数综合评估患者报告的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后生活质量。

Clinical Use of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice to Assess Patient Reported Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Harvard Longwood Program in Urology, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.080. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.080
PMID:27475967
Abstract

PURPOSE

EPIC-CP (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice) is a short questionnaire that comprehensively measures patient reported health related quality of life at the point of care. We evaluated the feasibility of using EPIC-CP in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer without research infrastructure. We compared longitudinal patient and practitioner reported prostate cancer outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed health related quality of life outcomes in 482 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2010 to 2014. EPIC-CP was administered and interpreted in routine clinical practice without research personnel. We compared practitioner documented rates of incontinence pad use and functional erections to patient reported rates using EPIC-CP.

RESULTS

A total of 708 EPIC-CP questionnaires were completed. Mean urinary incontinence domain scores were significantly higher (worse) than baseline (mean ± SD 0.6 ± 0.2) 3 and 6 months after treatment (mean 3.1 ± 2.3 and 2.2 ± 2.1, respectively, each p <0.05) but they returned to baseline at 12 months (mean 1.6 ± 1.7, p >0.05). Mean sexual domain scores were significantly worse than baseline (mean 2.4 ± 2.8) at all posttreatment time points (each p <0.05). Practitioners significantly overestimated incontinence pad-free rates at 3 months (48% vs 39%) and functional erection rates at 3 months (18% vs 12%), 6 months (38% vs 23%) and 12 months (45% vs 23%, each p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EPIC-CP is feasible to use in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer without requiring a research infrastructure. Using EPIC-CP in clinical practice may help practitioners objectively assess and appropriately manage posttreatment side effects in patients with prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

EPIC-CP(临床实践中扩展的前列腺癌指数综合)是一种简短的问卷,可全面测量患者在护理点的健康相关生活质量。我们评估了在没有研究基础设施的情况下,在前列腺癌患者的常规临床护理中使用 EPIC-CP 的可行性。我们比较了纵向患者和从业者报告的前列腺癌结果。

材料和方法

我们回顾了 2010 年至 2014 年在我们机构接受根治性前列腺切除术的 482 名患者的健康相关生活质量结果。在常规临床实践中,无需研究人员即可进行 EPIC-CP 管理和解释。我们将从业者记录的失禁垫使用率和功能性勃起与患者使用 EPIC-CP 报告的比率进行了比较。

结果

共完成了 708 份 EPIC-CP 问卷。治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月时,尿失禁域评分明显高于基线(平均值±SD,分别为 0.6±0.2 和 3.1±2.3 和 2.2±2.1,每个 p<0.05),但在 12 个月时恢复到基线(平均值 1.6±1.7,p>0.05)。治疗后所有时间点的性域评分均明显低于基线(平均值 2.4±2.8)(每个 p<0.05)。从业者在 3 个月时明显高估了无失禁垫率(48%对 39%)和功能勃起率(18%对 12%),6 个月(38%对 23%)和 12 个月(45%对 23%,每个 p<0.05)。

结论

在没有研究基础设施的情况下,EPIC-CP 可用于前列腺癌患者的常规临床护理。在临床实践中使用 EPIC-CP 可能有助于从业者客观评估和适当管理前列腺癌患者的治疗后副作用。

相似文献

1
Clinical Use of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice to Assess Patient Reported Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.用于临床实践的扩展前列腺癌指数综合评估患者报告的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后生活质量。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.080. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
2
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite versus Incontinence Symptom Index and Sexual Health Inventory for Men to measure functional outcomes after prostatectomy.前列腺癌指数复合量表与尿失禁症状指数和男性健康问卷用于评估前列腺切除术后的功能结局。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):221-7; discussion 227-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.155. Epub 2009 May 17.
4
Measuring and predicting prostate cancer related quality of life changes using EPIC for clinical practice.使用 EPIC 测量和预测前列腺癌相关生活质量变化用于临床实践。
J Urol. 2014 Mar;191(3):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.040. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
5
Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria.开放根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者尿控和性功能结局的比较:维多利亚州基于人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00966-0.
6
Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较:基于经过验证的生活质量结局的比较效果研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):898-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10551.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
7
Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗后尿失禁和勃起功能障碍:一项前瞻性、对照、非随机试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
Health-related quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的健康相关生活质量比较。
J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):325-331. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0659-8. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
9
Health-related quality of life outcomes from a contemporary prostate cancer registry in a large diverse population.来自一个大型多样化人群中当代前列腺癌登记处的健康相关生活质量结果。
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):520-529. doi: 10.1111/bju.13843. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Association Between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3 Years.局限性前列腺癌的放射治疗、手术或观察与3年后患者报告结局之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1126-1140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1704.

引用本文的文献

1
Toxicity profile and Patient-Reported outcomes following salvage Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy to the prostate Bed: The POPART multicentric prospective study.前列腺床挽救性立体定向消融放疗后的毒性特征及患者报告结局:POPART多中心前瞻性研究
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 25;44:100704. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100704. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Cryotherapy for partial gland ablation of prostate cancer: Oncologic and safety outcomes.冷冻治疗前列腺癌部分腺体切除术:肿瘤学和安全性结果。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9351-9362. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5692. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
3
Association of baseline self-reported fatigue with overall survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.
局限性前列腺癌立体定向体部放疗后基线自我报告的疲劳与总生存的关联
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 23;12:1015264. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1015264. eCollection 2022.
4
Acute Toxicity and Quality of Life in a Post-Prostatectomy Ablative Radiation Therapy (POPART) Multicentric Trial.前列腺癌术后消融放疗(POPART)多中心试验的急性毒性和生活质量。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 30;29(12):9349-9356. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120733.
5
Creation and validation of the harmonized Arabic version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP).用于临床实践的扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC-CP)阿拉伯语统一版本的创建与验证。
Arab J Urol. 2021 Nov 28;20(2):88-93. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002636. eCollection 2022.
6
Portuguese version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP): psychometric validation and prospective application for early functional outcomes at a single institution.《临床实践中扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC-CP)的葡萄牙语版本:在单家医疗机构中的心理测量学验证和早期功能结局的前瞻性应用》。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00734-y.
7
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) and LRP in patients with prostate cancer based on risk groups.基于风险分组的前列腺癌患者行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALRP)和腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)的围手术期结局
Arab J Urol. 2020 Apr 15;18(3):187-193. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1750865.
8
The role of hypofractionated radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer: early results of a randomized trial.大分割放疗在局限性前列腺癌根治性治疗中的作用:一项随机试验的早期结果
J Cancer. 2019 Oct 16;10(25):6217-6224. doi: 10.7150/jca.35510. eCollection 2019.
9
Significant association between urethral length measured by magnetic resonance imaging and urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.磁共振成像测量的尿道长度与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复之间的显著关联。
Prostate Int. 2019 Jun;7(2):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Predictors of well-being and quality of life in men who underwent radical prostatectomy: longitudinal study1.接受根治性前列腺切除术男性的幸福感和生活质量预测因素:纵向研究1
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Sep 3;26:e3031. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2601.3031.