Seemann Sophie
Medizinhist J. 2016;51(2):92-123.
Throughout his scientific career, the pathologist and anthropologist Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902) examined countless skulls, gradually changing his perspective on this object of research. Initially, he was mainly concerned with pathologically deformed skulls. From the 1850s onwards, he gradually developed a more anthropological approach, and anthropology increasingly came to dominate his scientific interest. This article shows how different influences became central for the establishment of his specific and dynamic model of the human skull development and its successful application in anthropology. Crucial for this process were Virchow's collaboration with his teacher Robert Froriep (1804-1861) in the department of pathology of the Charité, his research on cretinism and rickets, as well as his description of the base of the skull as the center of skull development. His research work was attended by and showed a reciprocal interaction with the buildup of large skull collections. This article uses Virchow's original publications on skull pathology as well as his still preserved skull specimens from the collection of the Berlin Museum of Medical History at the Charité for an integrated text and object based analysis.
在其整个科学职业生涯中,病理学家兼人类学家鲁道夫·菲尔绍(1821 - 1902)检查了无数的头骨,逐渐改变了他对这一研究对象的看法。最初,他主要关注病理性变形的头骨。从19世纪50年代起,他逐渐形成了一种更具人类学性质的方法,人类学越来越占据他的科学兴趣的主导地位。本文展示了不同的影响因素如何成为他建立人类头骨发育的独特动态模型以及该模型在人类学中成功应用的核心。这一过程的关键在于菲尔绍与他在夏里特医院病理科的老师罗伯特·弗罗里普(1804 - 1861)的合作、他对呆小症和佝偻病的研究,以及他将颅底描述为头骨发育中心的观点。他的研究工作伴随着大型头骨收藏的积累,并与之呈现出一种相互作用的关系。本文利用菲尔绍关于头骨病理学的原始出版物以及他保存在夏里特医院柏林医学史博物馆收藏中的头骨标本,进行基于文本和实物的综合分析。