Suppr超能文献

小组讨论与教育手册对伊朗护理专业学生患者隐私态度及行为影响的比较

Comparison of effect between group discussion and educational booklet on Iranian nursing students' attitude and practice toward patient privacy.

作者信息

Adib-Hajbaghery Mohsen, Faraji Mona

机构信息

Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Jul 28;13:29. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.29. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effects between group discussion and educational booklet on nursing students' attitude and practice toward patient privacy in Iran.

METHODS

A two-group, pre-test and post-test design study was conducted in 2015. The study was conducted on 60 nursing students in Kashan, Iran who were randomly allocated into two groups to be trained on patient privacy either through group discussion or by an educational booklet. The students' attitude and practice was assessed before and after the education using a questionnaire and a checklist. Data analysis was performed through paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and independent samples t-tests.

RESULTS

Before the intervention, no significant difference was found between the group designated to group discussion and that designated to the educational booklet in the mean overall score of attitude (P=0.303) and practice (P=0.493) toward patient privacy. After the intervention, the mean attitude score significantly increased in the two groups (P=0.001). Moreover, the students' practice score increased in the discussion group while it did not significantly change in the booklet group (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both methods were effective on the students' attitude; however, the educational booklet did not affect their practice toward patient privacy. Group discussion can effectively improve the students' attitude and practice toward patient privacy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较小组讨论和教育手册对伊朗护理专业学生在患者隐私方面的态度和实践的影响。

方法

2015年进行了一项两组前后测设计研究。该研究在伊朗卡尚的60名护理专业学生中开展,他们被随机分为两组,分别通过小组讨论或教育手册接受患者隐私方面的培训。使用问卷和检查表在教育前后评估学生的态度和实践情况。数据分析通过配对t检验、威尔科克森符号秩检验和独立样本t检验进行。

结果

干预前,指定进行小组讨论的组和指定使用教育手册的组在对患者隐私的态度平均总分(P = 0.303)和实践(P = 0.493)方面未发现显著差异。干预后,两组的态度平均得分均显著提高(P = 0.001)。此外,讨论组学生的实践得分提高,而手册组未显著变化(P = 0.001)。

结论

两种方法对学生的态度均有效;然而,教育手册并未影响他们在患者隐私方面的实践。小组讨论能有效改善学生在患者隐私方面的态度和实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f15/5066073/c2e447ab03ad/jeehp-13-29f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验